[time-nuts] (no subject)

[Stanley Reynolds]

My crystal ball indicates the comparison is used Lpro and used Tbolt, original 
poster wanted to know why expend $100 for Tbolt when Lpro is cheaper. 


Stanley




________________________________
From: Dan Rae <danrae at verizon.net>
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts at febo.com>
Sent: Thu, August 19, 2010 4:56:41 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] (no subject)

Bob Camp wrote:
> Hi
>
> Simple answer - they self calibrate to < 1x10^-13 at a one day time period.
> Essentially zero long term drift. 
>
> Bob
>
>  
Have I missed something?  A self calibrating cheap Rb unit?  a self 
calibrating 10811?  I really must wake up :^)

dr
> -----Original Message-----
> From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
> Behalf Of Mark2
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:49 PM
> To: time-nuts at febo.com
> Subject: [time-nuts] (no subject)
>
> Sure they're good but other than it's a really cool and stable oscillator
> why is everyone bothering with these when you can get a decent LPRO Rubidium
> for the same or less $$$$. It at lest ten times more stable than the HP oven
> job. I just bought 5 good LPROs on Ebay for about $200.00 plus shipping...  
>
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
>  


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.