[time-nuts] radioactive decay rates change?

Magnus Danielson magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org
Tue Aug 24 07:08:29 UTC 2010


On 08/24/2010 08:56 AM, WB6BNQ wrote:
> Poul,
>
> That is absolutely not true !  Those CS-133's work very hard radiating from F1 to
> F2 and back again at 9+ GHz !
>
> Bill....WB6BNQ

Very small hams?

PHK naturally meant radioactive decay...

Cheers,
Magnus

>
> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> In message<4C72F32A.9000005 at elfpen.com>, Chris Howard writes:
>>
>>> http://news.stanford.edu/news/2010/august/sun-082310.html
>>>
>>> Any implication for CS clocks?
>>
>> No.  Cs133 is not radioactive.
>>
>> --
>> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
>> phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
>> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
>> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.





More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com mailing list