[time-nuts] Zero dead time and average frequency estimation

[paul swed]

I was digging through the rubiola site.
Some good stuff

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Tom Van Baak <tvb at leapsecond.com> wrote:

> Magnus,
>
> I see there are other versions of the Rubiola paper:
> <
> http://www.femto-st.fr/~rubiola/pdf-articles/archives/2004-arxiv-0411227v2-counters.pdf
> >
> <
> http://www.femto-st.fr/~rubiola/pdf-articles/journal/2005rsi-hi-res-freq-counters.pdf
> >
> <
> http://www.femto-st.fr/~rubiola/pdf-articles/conference/2005-ifcs-counters.pdf
> >
>
> And here is a slide presentation:
> <http://www.femto-st.fr/~rubiola/pdf-slides/2008T-femto-counters.pdf>
>
> Actually, all of Enrico's papers are a good read:
> http://www.femto-st.fr/~rubiola/indexx-publications.html
> http://www.femto-st.fr/~rubiola/indexx-oscillator-noise.html
> http://www.femto-st.fr/~rubiola/
>
> There's also a bunch of phase noise papers that would be of
> interest to those of you working on Dual Mixer Time Difference
> (DMTD) implementations.
>
>  In particular, there is one paper that corrects some mistakes of Rubiola,
>>> Australian if I remember correctly.
>>>
>> Yes, the paper by Dawkins, McFerran and Luiten:
>> http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?url=http...
>>
>
> Bruce, thanks for that link. Time to renew my IEEE subscription...
>
> /tvb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>