[time-nuts] A different timenuts interest

Magnus Danielson magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org
Thu Jul 22 20:11:04 EDT 2010


On 07/23/2010 01:54 AM, Oz-in-DFW wrote:
> Hmmm.  I thought time-nuts were nuts about time, with branch interests
> in accuracy, resolution, history...

History is nanoseconds ago.
Recent history is picoseconds ago.
Just now is femtoseconds ago.
Fraction of mind ago is attoseconds ago.
Acient history is microseconds ago.
Ages is microseconds ago
Major epochs in time i seconds ago.
Geological short period is minutes ago.
Geological epoch period is hours ago.

No?

Cheers,
Magnus

> On 7/22/2010 6:24 PM, jmfranke wrote:
>> Actually, I think you can find a time-nut for any span of time,
>> sub-nanosecond to leap seconds, to leap years, to ...
>>
>> John WA4WDL
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Jean-Louis Oneto"<Jean-Louis.Oneto at obs-azur.fr>
>> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 7:11 PM
>> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
>> <time-nuts at febo.com>
>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] A different timenuts interest
>>
>>> I also think so,
>>> but Time-nuts are nuts about attoseconds, not decades... ;-}
>>> Jean-Louis Oneto
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Camp"<lists at rtty.us>
>>> To: "'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'"
>>> <time-nuts at febo.com>
>>> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 8:03 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] A different timenuts interest
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I assume that was Napoleon III rather than the original....
>>>>
>>>> (I'd hate to see the time-nuts list get banned by the French History
>>>> Police).
>>>>
>>>> Bob
>>
>





More information about the time-nuts mailing list