[time-nuts] ADF4002 phase noise - in FireFly-IIA-100MHz

Henk henk at deriesp.demon.nl
Thu Mar 11 21:16:11 UTC 2010


Hi,

In order to avoid a dead zone in a phase detector there is a current  
pulse in both the up and the down source. The net result when locked  
is zero but the noise is still there. Therefor the moved charge in  
lock should be as low as possible. The up and down currents must be as  
short as possible. Therefor a well designed PFD will out perform a  
EXOR. I allways designed for the shortest pulses. For the nmos current  
source I used 100ps but the pmos dictated to go to 300ps.

Henk

Op 10 mrt 2010, om 19:36 heeft SAIDJACK at aol.com het volgende geschreven:

> Hi Ulrich,
>
> I think in our design the spec is limited by the ~-100dBc noise at  
> 100Hz
> offset of the 100MHz VCXO.
>
> Please note that the ADF4002 actually improves that noise by about  
> 15dB
> from the datasheet spec (or the unit we tested was that much better  
> than the
> one  shown in the datasheet).
>
> Also, the ADF4002 allows different Current settings for the PFD, this
> affects phase noise as well. Fine-tuning of these settings and the  
> loop filter
> reduced the noise further. We use a 10MHz PFD output, so that should  
> be
> optimal  for phase noise.
>
> So in short, we improve the inherent close-in PN performance of the  
> VCXO
> significantly. Would an Exor gate have resulted in better  
> performance? Maybe.
> But the 10MHz spur on the VCXO EFC pin from the EXOR output may  
> cause much
> higher spur levels at 10, 20, 30MHz etc on the VCXO output. And you  
> would
> have  to contend with counter noise (10:1 divider), and there would  
> not have
> been  flexibility in frequency, as well as a PLL Lock indicator..
>
> bye,
> Said
>
>
> In a message dated 3/10/2010 07:19:14 Pacific Standard Time,
> df6jb at ulrich-bangert.de writes:
>
> Let me  put forward the question in another way: Had you to lock a  
> 100 MHz
> VCXO to  a 10 MHz reference, what other chip had you used that you  
> believe
> is
> the  better performer? Please no injection locking or even stranger,  
> just
> plain  PLL.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.





More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com mailing list