[time-nuts] Time of death-Again
Hal Murray
hmurray at megapathdsl.net
Sat Oct 30 08:31:32 UTC 2010
> These pulsars have different rates. Could one use the relative timing of
> two or three pulsars? that is, T=0 is when pulsar A, B, and C are
> coincident. (or is the "beat rate" between them too high to be useful)
That's an interesting idea... Thanks.
Let's ignore the problem of communicating the agorithm to non-English
speakers.
I think there are two problem areas. Basically, the data isn't integer. One
fuzzy area is the period. The other is measuring an individual pulse.
Suppose you have 2 pulsars that might line up several or many years ago.
What does that mean? Suppose you know the periods to N decimal places. What
does "line up" mean? How close do they have to be?
Suppose you only have to go back a few years until things line up. Then the
major problem is the uncertainty on an individual pulse.
Suppose you have to go back a zillion years. Now the fuzz on the period adds
to the fuzz on measuring an individual pulse.
Mumble. I'm probably in way over my head at this point.
--
These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam.
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list