[time-nuts] UTR timescale draft spec

[WB6BNQ]

Hello Bernard,

I can understand your feelings.  My response was measured from the start of the subject matter, which, admittedly, was a different
thread on this list.  It did not start out well to say the least.  Clearly, this matter is a touchy subject from another list with a
history all its own.  As such bringing it to another list is not good etiquette, especially when it is off topic on this list.

73....Bill....WB6BNQ

f1ehx wrote:

> Bonjour,
> Vous vous foutez peut être du sujet de notre ami, mais ce sujet est respectable, ne serait-ce que par le travail qu'il a impliqué.
> Mais qui voit votre remontrance ne peut s'empècher de bondir à la sauvagerie de votre réponse en directe sur la liste.
> Je croyais être entre "gens bien", je vois qu'il y a aussi des sauvages sur cette liste,
> Adieu !
>
> Bernard.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "WB6BNQ" <wb6bnq at cox.net>
> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <time-nuts at febo.com>
> Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2011 4:32 AM
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] UTR timescale draft spec
>
> Michael Sokolov,
>
> I do not mean to be disrespectful, but this list is not about creating time
> scales or having argumentative threads about such mundane things as leap seconds
> in and of themselves.  I feel that you have crossed the argument from one thread
> to another for a purpose that is not consistent with this thread.  Need I point
> out that your nemeses has wisely ignored your onslaught out of both respect for
> the low noise level intent of this list and also because the subject matter does
> not, properly, belong on this list.
>
> I am going to ask that you respect this position and take your problems back to
> the list that is centered on that subject matter.  Or from another perspective,
> you could create  your very own list server and call it "Time-Scales" which would
> seem to be much more appropriate.
>
> In either case I know myself and others are not interested in this pattern of
> behavior and the endless responses that will occur.  Should you find this a bit
> troubling allow me to quote a line from a very famous movie:
>
> "Quite frankly my dear, I don't give a damn."
>
> Bill....WB6BNQ
>
> Michael Sokolov wrote:
>
> > Hello again,
> >
> > I have just written up the formal spec for the UTR timescale which I'm
> > seeking to implement on my "rubber duckie" timekeeping apparatus which I
> > had discussed here earlier this week, and I have released the first
> > draft for review:
> >
> > http://ifctfvax.Harhan.ORG/timekeeping/draft-utrspec.txt
> > http://ifctfvax.Harhan.ORG/timekeeping/draft-utrdef.txt
> >
> > Hopefully it will clarify exactly what I am after and why I'm doing it.
> >
> > MS
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > and follow the instructions there.
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.