[time-nuts] gravity controlled pendulumn clock?

Reeves Paul Paul.Reeves at uk.thalesgroup.com
Thu Dec 15 06:02:54 EST 2011


Capacitance is, of course, measured in 'jars' as per the 'Admiralty Handbook
of Wireless Telegraphy' (1930 -ish) :-)
.... I do use Farads (bits of them, anyway) guys, really.

Paul Reeves   G8GJA

-----Original Message-----
From: Don Latham [mailto:djl at montana.com] 
Sent: 14 December 2011 21:02
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] gravity controlled pendulumn clock?

OK, it's right most folks (except for NASA, poke poke) do not have to know
the difference between a pound mass and a pound force, or capacitance in ???
etc. The SI units are best for science because they are all tied together
with common ground. OTH, my grandmother's cookie recipe only puts pounds or
is it slugs on me...
Don

Justin Pinnix
> Contrary to popular belief, most of us in the U.S. have heard of the 
> metric system and understand how it works.  Personally, I agree that 
> it is a simpler and superior system.
>
> But, English is the system we "think" in.  We know that if a person is 
> 300 lbs they need to lose weight, you need to drink 8 cups of water a 
> day, and wish for 70 degree days.  Grandma's cookie recipe uses 1 cup 
> of flour.
>  Trying to convince 300 million people to re-learn all of that is a 
> tough sell when there is no obvious advantage to them.  Most are not 
> scientists or engineers and aren't likely to do business with a 
> foreign country.
>
> Those of us who are scientists and engineers likely use metric at work 
> and English at home.  Is that wrong?  Maybe, but we're smart people 
> and we can deal with it :-)
>
> It's not like metric is totally absent.  We drink 2 liter cokes and 
> defend
> ourselves with 9mm pistols.   Our cars use mostly metric parts.  Even
> ham
> radio operators, arguably the most jingoistic and set in the past 
> bunch around, get on the 80, 40, and 20 METER bands.
>
> Furthermore, I've been to some of these countries that supposedly use 
> the metric system.  One of them measured distance between cities in km 
> and speed limits in MPH.  Now THAT was annoying!
>
> "Progressives" tried to force Metric on the U.S. in the 1970s and it 
> didn't catch on.  Besides, we've got bigger standardization problems 
> to deal with these days - getting everyone here to speak English!
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:29 PM, <shalimr9 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I told myself I would stop after my last posts, but I can't help it.
>>
>> I do not pretend to know everything, but I am one of the relatively 
>> few in my circle of friends with extensive experience with both 
>> systems, and after
>> 26 years here, the imperial system has simply not made a case for 
>> itself as far as I am concerned. It is my opinion, and a fact as far 
>> as I am concerned, not that it makes it a universal truth in any 
>> other frame of reference. Your mileage may vary.
>>
>> I agree that the decimal system is a big part of what makes me prefer 
>> the metric system. The meter itself is not a superior unit than the 
>> inch or the foot to measure anything. But there are other 
>> considerations when using one "system" versus the other.
>> Our designers and mechanical engineers here use decimal fractions of 
>> an inch in specifying mechanical drawings, but raw metal stock (and
>> tools) are
>> still only available in 1/4, 1/8, 1/16 (and so on) of an inch 
>> dimensions, so most dimensions have to be given with 3 or 4 decimals, 
>> and even then they are not always right. When trying to mentally add 
>> two, three or four dimensions each with 4 decimals, and one or two 
>> digits to the left of the decimal point, it stops being fun and its 
>> easy to make mistakes.
>> Somehow, that was never an issue when I was designing back in France.
>> Most
>> dimensions has 2 or 3 significant digits, making the mental juggling 
>> much easier.
>> That was the reason for my characterization of the imperial system as 
>> being more error prone. I never said or implied that it was less 
>> precise.
>> Precision is a function of the instrument, not the frame of reference.
>>
>> In the metric system, screws and wires are referenced by their 
>> diameter, not a reference number that requires a table to figure out 
>> how big they are. I understand these numbers correspond to something, 
>> they are not arbitrary, but while they may simplify "some" 
>> calculations, in everyday tasks, these numbers tend to complicate 
>> life instead of simplifying it.
>> Here, every designer has tables after tables plastered on their walls.
>> In
>> France, I do not remember that we needed so many.
>>
>> Another small thing I miss is that a liter of water weighs a kg 
>> (under reference conditions, I forgot what that was :). Then the 
>> specific weight of various materials only has to be known by their 
>> "density" (ratio of specific weight compared to water). It makes all 
>> sorts of calculations ( and guestimations) easy.
>>
>> But its just my opinion :)
>>
>> Didier
>>
>> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless thingy while I do other things...
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Chuck Harris <cfharris at erols.com>
>> Sender: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com
>> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:30:34
>> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement< 
>> time-nuts at febo.com>
>> Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>>        <time-nuts at febo.com>
>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] gravity controlled pendulumn clock?
>>
>> Hal Murray wrote:
>> ...
>> >
>> > If you were an alien landing on Earth for the first time, which
>> system
>> would
>> > make more sense to you?
>>
>> Ah!   A Godcentric view of the universe.  Decimal is an arbitrary
>> number system that came about purely because we had 10 fingers, and a 
>> brain that could only think of using them to count on.
>>
>> Your hands are probably right now fondling a model of a life form 
>> that would find the metric system to be quite foreign, and unfriendly...
>> Surely you should count using a number system based on an even power 
>> of 2?
>>
>> There was a time when I spent more time doing arithmetic in octal 
>> than in decimal.  If humans had been born with 4 fingers on each 
>> hand, we would be talking about how certain we were that an alien 
>> would find an octal centric measurement system made more sense.
>>
>> Metric is purely arbitrary, as are all of the variants on the English 
>> system.  Life would go just as smoothly if we had standardized on the 
>> inch, pound, and gallon, and used decimal fractions and multiples to 
>> represent measurements larger and smaller than the unit.
>>
>> -Chuck Harris
>>
>> OBTW, as time nuts, we are steeped in the two units of measure that 
>> are decidedly non-metric: seconds, and Hz.  Think about it...
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>


-- 
"Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument
are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind."
R. Bacon
"If you don't know what it is, don't poke it."
Ghost in the Shell


Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com



_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

This email, including any attachment, is a confidential communication
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is
addressed. It contains information which is private and may be proprietary
or covered by legal professional privilege. If you have received this email
in error, please notify the sender upon receipt, and immediately delete it
from your system.

Anything contained in this email that is not connected with the businesses
of this company is neither endorsed by nor is the liability of this company.

Whilst we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure that any attachment to
this email has been swept for viruses, we cannot accept liability for any
damage sustained as a result of software viruses, and would advise that you
carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment.





More information about the time-nuts mailing list