[time-nuts] "The GPS navigation is the weakest point,"
Paul.Reeves at uk.thalesgroup.com
Fri Dec 16 03:32:43 EST 2011
I seem to remember a recent 'jamming' trial off the east coast of England
that didn't kill the GPS but did shift the position of the ships involved -
certainly enough to get them aground or to hit something if they weren't
paying attention. I think one showed up inland - which should have been
suspicious! Sorry, cannot remember the reference but was mentioned in GPS
World, I think.
Paul Reeves G8GJA
From: gary [mailto:lists at lazygranch.com]
Sent: 15 December 2011 23:45
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] "The GPS navigation is the weakest point,"
I've talked to the GPS jammers at Nellis and have seen their gear. They
don't spoof but just jam. The gear is totally COTS. Some Marconi signal
generator that can generate white noise at the two GPS frequencies. They
have omni or directional antennas. They have an old Russian jammer on hand,
but the Marconi works a lot better.
I've been jammed by them. It is interesting in that the GPS just suddenly
dies. That is, it seems to track given some noise, but you hit a point where
it suddenly gives up. It is the only time I've seen no satellites shown on
It wouldn't surprise me if a Growler could spoof a GPS, but I have no hard
evidence that it can.
I'm in agreement with they just jammed everything and the thing ran out of
fuel. I have a FOIA somewhere on a Predator crash. With LOS, it just orbits.
In the case of this Predator, it orbited into a mountain near Creech AFB.
On 12/15/2011 3:18 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:
> I bet this drone contains no technology that is not exportable. Of
> course they had to think about a crash.
> I also bet it had an inertial nav system as backup to the GPS. But
> and this is the key to all backups. You have to know the primary is
> failed. When you jam GPS the smart way is not to over power it with
> white noise but to first transmit an IDENTICAL signal. Then very
> slowly move your stronger signal away from "truth" until it is sending
> a false signal. This way the receiver does not know it is being
> jammed. No I did not just think of this, it's what "everyone" does.
> But why then if the INS and GPS disagree was there not an alarm? It
> was likely a low-cost INS that needed periodic updates from a GPS
> I would not rule out that they simply made the drone fly into a big
> fishing net and dropped it with a parachute in a kind of controlled
> mid air collision. Heck the US used to capture film cam falling from
> space with big nets
> Chris Albertson
> Redondo Beach, California
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
> and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
and follow the instructions there.
This email, including any attachment, is a confidential communication
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is
addressed. It contains information which is private and may be proprietary
or covered by legal professional privilege. If you have received this email
in error, please notify the sender upon receipt, and immediately delete it
from your system.
Anything contained in this email that is not connected with the businesses
of this company is neither endorsed by nor is the liability of this company.
Whilst we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure that any attachment to
this email has been swept for viruses, we cannot accept liability for any
damage sustained as a result of software viruses, and would advise that you
carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment.
More information about the time-nuts