[time-nuts] how good an oscillator do you need for a GPS simulator
azelio.boriani at screen.it
Fri Dec 16 10:46:38 EST 2011
A used Spirent is only 26K to 37K. Interesting: playing back bits from
RAM... can it be that simple? Obvious: a DAC is required.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Jim Lux <jimlux at earthlink.net> wrote:
> On 12/15/11 10:25 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:
>> For testing, I'd assume the gps simulator only needs to be good enough
>> that the receiver will detect the signal. There is some Doppler
>> shift so the receiver must have to look over a wider range of
>> frequencies so if the simulator was inside that range it could work.
>> Light travels at about one foot per nanosecond. so your simulator
>> should need to know the time to within a few tens of nanoseconds.
>> Receivers can deal with not-perfect signal. Multipath and refraction
>> are common.
> Not just functional test, but to verify the "added noise" from the
> TO just see if it can acquire and track, pretty crummy would work, because
> it's just like the horrible signals it's seeing "off the air"
> You GPS simulator would likely have a GPS receiver inside of it and
>> sync to a real GPS.
> Not necessarily. You might be testing in a screen room with no external
> signals available.
> Clearly, one can go out and spend 500k on a nice Spirent, but I'm looking
> at what is the few hundred dollar solution. A reasonably quiet oscillator
> driving an FPGA or playing back bits from RAM
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Jim Lux<jimlux at earthlink.net> wrote:
>>> Say you want a quik n easy n cheap GPS simulator to test a GPS timing
>>> receiver. How good does the oscillator (presumably some nice multiple of
>>> the chip rate) have to be?
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts