[time-nuts] fluke.l monitor for Thunderbolt . . . the sagacontinues

shalimr9 at gmail.com shalimr9 at gmail.com
Wed Jul 6 23:34:17 UTC 2011


Because a real regulator costs more than 3 diodes and when you already have a 5V regulator, the 3 diodes work fine.

Didier

Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless thingy while I do other things...

-----Original Message-----
From: David VanHorn <D.VanHorn at elec-solutions.com>
Sender: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 14:56:47 
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement<time-nuts at febo.com>
Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
	<time-nuts at febo.com>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] fluke.l monitor for Thunderbolt . . . the saga
 continues


I've heard this discussed a few times, and the idea of using diodes to "regulate" this way makes me very queasy.
Why would a real 3.3V regulator not be used?


________________________________________

If the new chip requires 3.3 vdc and there aren't 3 diodes on the board to drop
the 5 vdc down, this will be a problem. The old board had 3 zero ohm resistors
in place of the diodes and this is why some of the boards failed. As I had
posted previously, I used a red LED as a 1.7-1.8 volt zener to drop the 5 volts
down to the proper value.  The LED went in place of the 3 regular diodes.

    -Arthur
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com mailing list