[time-nuts] The future of UTC
Steve Rooke
sar10538 at gmail.com
Fri Jul 15 14:27:06 UTC 2011
On 16 July 2011 02:20, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk at phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
> In message <4E2046DB.3040206 at erols.com>, Chuck Harris writes:
>>Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>>I can see a 20 year prediction being seriously fraught with error.
>
> Not really, starting out with just one leap second every 18 months
> gets you pretty good first approximation. DUT1 would probably still
> be less than 3 seconds.
Sorry to barge in here but I thought the leap second need was about a
two year thing so wouldn't that mean a ten second jump at the twenty
year mark.
Steve
>>I am not at all happy with the idea of
>>having it magically stall, or stutter. That's something for some
>>library function to keep track of after the fact.
>
> That is exactly my point: With 6 months notice, getting the
> libraries updated using regular software update channels is not
> feasible.
>
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
--
Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV & G8KVD
The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once.
- Einstein
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list