[time-nuts] improved WWVB signal being planned?

[Magnus Danielson]

On 03/29/2011 09:20 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message<4D92254F.1060701 at rubidium.dyndns.org>, Magnus Danielson writes:
>> On 03/29/2011 04:14 AM, tcxo wrote:
>
>> Adding a phase-modulation will, if done with care, have no significant
>> impact on receivers not capable of utilizing the modulation. Modulation
>> capable receiver should however be of interest, but I wonder if anyone
>> would make one commercially.
>
> Meinberg already have them for DCF77.

They should be able to adapt to WWVB in that case, yes. They seem to do 
a good jobb when they take on things.

> It's not tricky to build one yourself.

True, but if you are looking up the 17025 secondary measure stuff then 
off the shelf products is probably preferred.

Cheers,
Magnus