[time-nuts] DGPS at home

[Azelio Boriani]

Yes, if you use statistics then you must be slow or, better, stop and
collect data. I think that ionosphere movements that cause errors are
slower than robots movements so it is hard to collect enough data for
statistics, of course maybe that only two points to average out is better
than nothing...

On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Chris Albertson
<albertson.chris at gmail.com>wrote:

> I think the accuracy could be quite good if you took advantage of the
> times the robot was motionless.  During those times it could build up
> many seconds of averaging and then while moving either use dead
> reckoning or inertial navigation.
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:01 AM, ehydra <ehydra at arcor.de> wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I wonder what would be reasonable location accuracy if two cheap same
> type
> > GPS modules will be several meters apart? I understand that it involves
> > statistical numbers.
> >
> > Any idea? Say for a small robot.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > - Henry
> >
> >
> > --
> > ehydra.dyndns.info
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> > To unsubscribe, go to
> > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > and follow the instructions there.
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Chris Albertson
> Redondo Beach, California
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>