[time-nuts] Tongue Testing battery charge levels....

Jim Lux jimlux at earthlink.net
Tue Nov 29 19:59:45 EST 2011


On 11/29/11 3:38 PM, David VanHorn wrote:
>
> Google it.  :)
>
> ________________________________________
> From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On Behalf Of J. L. Trantham [jltran at att.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 3:58 PM
> To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Tongue Testing battery charge levels....
>
> It could be a 'taste' thing.  Eveready tastes better than Duracell?
>
> Joe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
> Behalf Of David VanHorn
> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 10:26 AM
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Tongue Testing battery charge levels....
>
>
> So you wouldn't advise it with an Eveready #497 battery?  VVBG
>
> Even with that one I can't imagine getting enough current across the heart
> to matter.
> There is more than one reason that defibrillators use such large paddles
> placed across the chest cavity.
> Still, I value the functionality of my tongue, so I'll skip that test.
>


I used to buy those for an electronic flash.  I was SO glad when the 
inverter power pack came out and I could just buy gross lots of C batteries.





More information about the time-nuts mailing list