[time-nuts] FRK specs.....

Brian, WA1ZMS wa1zms at att.net
Sun Aug 12 08:09:09 EDT 2012


Thanks Tom.  

I agree, the SRS seems to be the best
overall Rb except maybe on old HP if one is willing to spend about the same price on a 20 year old unit.  The SRS units I bought for work were only $2700 with chassis, rack ears and multiple outputs.



-Brian, WA1ZMS

On Aug 12, 2012, at 3:17 AM, Tom Knox <actast at hotmail.com> wrote:

> 
> Hi Brian;
> There are a few decent rubidium oscillators short term like the SRS but none are great, in my humble opinion you are much better off disciplining a good quartz oscillator off your LPRO.
> Best Wishes;
> Thomas Knox
> 
> 
> 
>> From: wa1zms at att.net
>> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 21:56:13 -0700
>> To: time-nuts at febo.com
>> Subject: [time-nuts] FRK specs.....
>> 
>> I used to be of the opinion that the Efratom FRK-H was the best of the models of FRK Rb standards for both short-term stability and overall performance.
>> 
>> Is that still true today?
>> 
>> I know there are better solutions for short-term (BVA OCXO) and long term
>> (Cs & MASERS). But where to things stack up today?
>> 
>> I'm looking to buy an Rb that's better than my LPROs and other models.
>> But I do not own an FRK-H.
>> 
>> Looking for comments, please.
>> 
>> Thanks in advance,
>> -Brian, WA1ZMS
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>                         
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.




More information about the time-nuts mailing list