[time-nuts] Controlling FEI 5680A

EWKehren at aol.com EWKehren at aol.com
Sun Jan 15 15:29:48 EST 2012


One 14 pin uP along with a MAX3000A will do it hands down.
Bert
 
 
In a message dated 1/15/2012 2:43:54 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
davidwhess at gmail.com writes:

I would  just use a PIC, AVR, or ARM even if I had to use more than one
with some  discrete logic on the side but I like solder, assembly, and
low level  coding in that order.  If I find a small, cheap, easy to
use, and  general purpose FPGA, I may look into that as well.

MIPS may be a  special case for implementation.  The original Loongson
design  (Chinese) lacked 4 instructions that MIPS still had IP
protection  on.

On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:45:56 +0100, Magnus  Danielson
<magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org> wrote:

>A short  notice on embedded CPU/MPUs into FPGAs. Using PIC or AVR might 
>be  tempting, but I consider any clone "dirty" from a rights perspective,  
>MIPS for instance have been very protective on their side, so has ARM.  
>So far has the SPARC been the only big one being accepted in their  
>LEON-x variants that I know of. We be sad to see the cotton industry  
>level being smashed by the big firm lawyers.
>
>So, either  using the OpenRISC variants or similar. There is loads of 
>CPUs on the  OpenCores website, but just because they are there do not 
>think they  are free to use if they are clones of commercial stuff.
>
>I would  either use one of the FPGA vendors CPUs and then write the core 
>in C,  or use a free CPU.
>
>I could also roll my own CPU, as I have  already done before, but 
>building a tool-chain including GCC is a bit  of home-work. For my 
>application I haven't bothered, but it is  tempting to get C capabilities.
>
>Then again, if someone could  show that the PIC and/or AVR is free to 
>clone in FGPA, by showing a  clear statement from the respective 
>technology holders, then that  would be a way forward.
>
>I've done this analysis before, and so  far I have not seen any 
>comprehensive open analysis covering these  aspects.
>
>I fear that this is way off topic for this list, so I  propose that this 
>aspects is continued on another list, such as the  FPGA-Synth list, which 
>faces essentially the same  problems.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.




More information about the time-nuts mailing list