[time-nuts] Controlling FEI 5680A
EWKehren at aol.com
EWKehren at aol.com
Sun Jan 15 15:29:48 EST 2012
One 14 pin uP along with a MAX3000A will do it hands down.
In a message dated 1/15/2012 2:43:54 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
davidwhess at gmail.com writes:
I would just use a PIC, AVR, or ARM even if I had to use more than one
with some discrete logic on the side but I like solder, assembly, and
low level coding in that order. If I find a small, cheap, easy to
use, and general purpose FPGA, I may look into that as well.
MIPS may be a special case for implementation. The original Loongson
design (Chinese) lacked 4 instructions that MIPS still had IP
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:45:56 +0100, Magnus Danielson
<magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org> wrote:
>A short notice on embedded CPU/MPUs into FPGAs. Using PIC or AVR might
>be tempting, but I consider any clone "dirty" from a rights perspective,
>MIPS for instance have been very protective on their side, so has ARM.
>So far has the SPARC been the only big one being accepted in their
>LEON-x variants that I know of. We be sad to see the cotton industry
>level being smashed by the big firm lawyers.
>So, either using the OpenRISC variants or similar. There is loads of
>CPUs on the OpenCores website, but just because they are there do not
>think they are free to use if they are clones of commercial stuff.
>I would either use one of the FPGA vendors CPUs and then write the core
>in C, or use a free CPU.
>I could also roll my own CPU, as I have already done before, but
>building a tool-chain including GCC is a bit of home-work. For my
>application I haven't bothered, but it is tempting to get C capabilities.
>Then again, if someone could show that the PIC and/or AVR is free to
>clone in FGPA, by showing a clear statement from the respective
>technology holders, then that would be a way forward.
>I've done this analysis before, and so far I have not seen any
>comprehensive open analysis covering these aspects.
>I fear that this is way off topic for this list, so I propose that this
>aspects is continued on another list, such as the FPGA-Synth list, which
>faces essentially the same problems.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts