[time-nuts] hijacking threads (was: ntpq output)
attila at kinali.ch
Mon Jan 23 03:51:23 EST 2012
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:34:57 -0800
gary <lists at lazygranch.com> wrote:
> The following is a few ntpq -p outputs. Just random samples over a week.
> I seem to periodically have large offset.
> I'm open to suggest how to improve this if the numbers don't look normal.
> Please trim the raw data to keep the size of any replies as small as
May i ask the people here not to hijack threads?
Ie do NOT press reply on a random mail and change the subject completely.
The better mail clients support threading which means that mails that
are a reply to another are sorted directly after that. Which gives a
convenient way to keep conversations together. This helps enormously
to read mailinglists with a many parallel discussions such as time-nuts.
If you now reply to a random message, then your mail ends up in a
completely unrelated discussion, and might be burried there between
other mails where noone looks.
Instead of replying to the mail, right-click on the email adress of the
mailinglist and select "compose mail to" (or what your mail client calls it).
This will create a new mail that does not reference any other mail and thus
will start a new discussion.
The trouble with you, Shev, is you don't say anything until you've saved
up a whole truckload of damned heavy brick arguments and then you dump
them all out and never look at the bleeding body mangled beneath the heap
-- Tirin, The Dispossessed, U. Le Guin
More information about the time-nuts