[time-nuts] Racal-Dana 1991 w. Option 4C - what is that ?

Hal Murray hmurray at megapathdsl.net
Mon Jan 30 17:01:06 EST 2012

lmcdavid at lmceng.com said:
> My understanding is that a 5 MHz crystal is inherently more stable than  a
> 10 MHz crystal so better overall performance is achieved by using a 5  MHz
> crystal and doubling the output to get 10 MHz. 

What makes 5 MHz more stable than 10 MHz?

Why not 2.5 MHz and double twice?  Or 1.25 MHz and three doublers?

These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's.  I hate spam.

More information about the time-nuts mailing list