[time-nuts] Fwd: GPS and Rubidium frequency standards and noise question (new...
EWKehren at aol.com
EWKehren at aol.com
Mon Jun 4 02:44:53 UTC 2012
I would not use a Thunderbolt. It dithers the OCXO frequency to correct
the second pulse and that frequency change will be multiplied particularly in
U wave applications.. I have never checked, but if LH has a hold function
you could use it, but in that case I would also bring out the OCXO direct
and amplify external if you plan on using it 1 GHz and above, if so contact
me off list
Bert Kehren
In a message dated 6/3/2012 5:59:35 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
chris at chriswilson.tv writes:
> Hi
> For your immediate need, a Thunderbolt sounds like the ideal
> solution. It will give you a very accurate reference to sort out
> your test gear and likely "good enough" phase noise for most of the
> rest of what you want to do. Once you get into the microwave stuff,
> plan your PLL's properly and all will be well there.
> Bob
OK, I'll go for a Thunderbolt, is it allowed and acceptable etiquette to
show an Ebay ad to check it's the later type, which I think it is?
You have all been a great help, thank you very much indeed, I doubt I
will become as obsessive with accuracy as some of you apparently are,
but it's good to know that such a friendly and sharing group of
experts exists in one locale!
03/06/2012 22:50
--
Best Regards,
Chris Wilson.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list