[time-nuts] NIST Traceability [WAS: WWVB BPSK...]
Charles P. Steinmetz
charles_steinmetz at lavabit.com
Sat Mar 24 06:46:25 UTC 2012
Michael wrote:
>My concern about the BPSK, and breaking my Spectracom oscillator, is really
>centered on loosing my NIST traceable reference oscillator. I don't care one
>bit what time of day it is. * * *
>
>So while an HP-117 or a Spectracon 8160 oscillator phase locked to
>WWVB is "by definition" an NIST traceable standard so long as it is
>in lock and
>you have a valid lock history, a GPS unit, even though it may be
>just as stable an
>oscillator, isn't an NIST traceable standard without a whole lot of
>equipment to
>validate that NIST and the GPS system are in sync. * * *
>
>For all you metrology guys out there, has any of this recently changed?
These NIST links should get you started:
http://nist.gov/traceability/
http://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/2297.pdf
http://www.nist.gov/pml/div688/grp40/gpsarchive.cfm
<http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CEEQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Ftf.boulder.nist.gov%2Fgeneral%2Fpdf%2F1502.pdf&ei=CmRtT9fSB4ji0gGAm7n_Bg&usg=AFQjCNGO0uxF4gdRhld-L8PEERwEmaGgGg>
Note that only *measurement results* are "traceable" -- not local
standards. There is no such thing as a "NIST traceable
standard." And even with a WWVB reference, one needs an "internal
measurement assurance program" to support a claim of traceability for
the measurements that one makes. Just having an HP-117 or Spectracon
8160 is not sufficient to claim NIST traceability for one's
measurements. Note that less than 1% of claimed "NIST traceability"
really is traceable to NIST. For all the stuff on eBay that claims
to be "NIST calibrated" (Really? Did you take that to Boulder for
calibration?) or "NIST traceable," only a negligible amount of it really is.
Best regards,
Charles
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list