[time-nuts] Why 9,192,631,770 ??

paul swed paulswedb at gmail.com
Wed May 9 01:19:06 UTC 2012


Thanks downloaded the paper. I assume the hyper fine transition happened to
be the one nearest that frequency? You can tune to either side of the peak
and get a lock on the next transition.
Regards
Paul.

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:14 PM, David C. Partridge <
david.partridge at perdrix.co.uk> wrote:

> It's unlikely you'll ever see a negative leap second - the earth's
> rotation is slowing down, not speeding up.
>
> Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
> Behalf Of Jerry Mulchin
> Sent: 09 May 2012 01:56
> To: jfor at quikus.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Why 9,192,631,770 ??
>
> >It is interesting that the leap seconds correction is always a positive
> number.
>
> Jerry
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>



More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com mailing list