[time-nuts] Best phase detector / mixer for 100MHz?
Adrian
rfnuts at arcor.de
Tue Nov 27 10:03:33 UTC 2012
Bruce Griffiths schrieb:
> Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/23/2012 9:38 AM, Bruce Griffiths wrote:
>>>
>>> NIST have shown (at least at 10MHz) that the high level mixers they
>>> tested are noisier than the ZRPD1.
>>>
>>> Bruce
>>
>> Do you have a citation to where they said that?
>> What you quoted doesn't make sense, at least, out of context.
>>
>> We need to clarify phase detector sensitivity specs.
>> For conventional (IE 50 ohm) phase detectors, it is
>> apples vs apples to just go by the volts per radian number.
>> However, mixers like the ZRPD1 artificially triple the
>> voltage sensitivity by operating at 500 ohms, and using
>> transformers to connect to 50 ohm equipment. Doing this
>> doesn't increase the possible signal to noise ratio.
>> Consider this thought experiment. Build your best 500 ohm
>> phase detector and postamp. Now replace with a 50 ohm
>> phase detector and connect 3 postamps in parallel. It is
>> a wash. Of course, you don't have to actually do this.
>> You can simply use an op amp like the LT1028 with very
>> low noise voltage.
>>
>> To actually put a 500 ohm detector on a par with a 50 ohm
>> detector, the 500 ohm detector would need to use 3 diodes
>> in series compared to one in the 50 ohm case. With only
>> one diode per arm, the maximum drive power utilization is
>> considerably lower.
>>
>> Rick Karlquist N6RK
>>
> http://tf.boulder.nist.gov/general/pdf/2556.pdf
>
> Where all the high level mixers measured have a higher phase noise
> than lower level mixers/phase detectors like the ZRPD1.
>
> Bruce
I can't confirm their results, at least not when plugged into a HP
11848A which loads the PD with 50 Ohms.
Too bad they are unclear about the applied power.
(1) Is it 'LO Power = maximum mixer power = 11 dBm', that is +11 dBm
into both ports?
(2) Is it +17 dBm due to 'mixers with a nominal LO rating of +7 dBm and
maximum rating of +17 dBm'?
Or, is it 50 mW as specified by Minicircuits, which would be the maximum
mixer power as by (1)?
With +16...+17 dBm signals I'm getting a noise floor of -175 dBc/Hz
which is quite poor but understandable as in order to drive it at
nominal input power, I have to put 6 dB attenuators between the
oscillators and the phase detector. With only 3 dB attenuation, I'm
getting -178 dBc/Hz. I wasn't sure if the 50 mW spec refers to the total
RF power into the ZRPD-1 or if that is the max. power into each input,
so I didn't try +17 dBm. I would have expected to see -180...-181 dBc/Hz.
At that input level the 11848A internal PD gets me -179 dBc/Hz (no
attenuators required).
A WJ M9GC was 1 dB worse than the internal PD (also w/o attenuators).
Surprisingly I've got the best results (-181) with a +23 dBm mixer (w/o
attenuators of course).
I did not have +23 dBm signals at hands, but I don't see that the ZRPD-1
can compete with the 11848A PD or an external +23 dBm mixer at input
levels of +17 dBm and above.
Adrian
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list