[time-nuts] Timing performance of servers
robkimberley at btinternet.com
Thu Oct 25 04:20:56 EDT 2012
You can get NTP for windows and also their NTP Monitor.
From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
Behalf Of Edgardo Molina
Sent: 25 October 2012 01:05
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Timing performance of servers
I will allow myself to share a comment on your thread.
Timing on windows servers is not one of their plausible strengths. It was
clearly pointed out during the SIM conference last week at CENAM. In fact
there was an interesting discussion about the drawbacks when using NTP
Windows based servers and all kind of NTP appliances compared to full size
Linux based NTP servers. The example of what NIST is using nationwide for
their servers set an example of good server hardware and linux to provide
the nation's NTP pulse.
I haven't done any experiments with Windows for NTP services, still it could
be interesting as to set a benchmark while comparing it to the Linux boxes.
I am currently trying out the Domain Time II NTP client from Symmetricom for
the thesis. I have to come back to Symmetricom's Miguel García to decide on
purchasing a Domain Time II NTP client kit. How is the Mainberg NTP client
different from the Symmetricom version? Have you tried both? If not I will
be more than glad to help comparing both if you can help me pointing out the
source for a demo version of Mainberg's software. Maybe then an objective
review of both clients will be in order, I will be more than glad to do it
or to test them against Windows NTP services, appliances and/or Linux NTP
boxes. I have at least an example of those at the office.
Just my 2x10 cents.
Regards to you and the group,
T : 55 55 55202444
M : 04455 20501854
Piensa en Bits SA de CV
CONFIDENCIALIDAD DE INFORMACION
Este mensaje tiene carácter confidencial. Si usted no es el destinarario de
este mensaje, le suplicamos se lo notifique al remitente mediante un correo
electrónico y que borre el presente mensaje y sus anexos de su computadora
sin retener una copia de los mismos. Queda estrictamente prohibido copiar
este mensaje o hacer usode el para cualquier propósito o divulgar su en
forma parcial o total su contenido. Gracias.
NON-DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION
This email is strictly confidential and may also be privileged. If you are
not the intended recipient please immediately advise the sender by replying
to this e-mail and then deleting the message and its attachments from your
computer without keeping a copy. It is strictly forbidden to copy it or use
it for any purpose or disclose its contents to any third party. Thank you.
On Oct 24, 2012, at 5:47 PM, Magnus Danielson <magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org>
> Fellow time-nuts,
> When spending time on a conference last week, I heard one interesting
comment that they lost data due to bad timing on their Windows servers.
> Now, I know that the standard Windows uses SNTP in order to achieve the
goal of having the timing of the machines sufficiently aligned to allow
Kerberos authentication. SNTP suffice for that, as it needs to be a handful
of minutes in line.
> If you need better performance than that, you should use NTP (and then
download and install Meinbergs Windows-client for NTP).
> Then again, I would point out that for this type of data, it would most
probably be better served on a Linux box.
> What should be a nice wake-up call for them would be a summation of how
different strategies would give them clock precision of sufficient grade.
So, does anyone know of such measurements presented anywhere?
> There are bits and pieces, but the ideal for this case would be if they
where collected in one page/paper.
> This is an awareness thing, so that people can do a little more
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
> and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts