[time-nuts] Timing performance of servers
xe1xus at amsat.org
Sat Oct 27 13:41:35 EDT 2012
I do not have a reference for the performance of Windows as NTP server. This has been a busy week and long working nights. It is a logical workload after being absent for nearly two weeks : )
I will browse the web and NIST to find some solid references to this issue. I am still enthusiastic about doing the side by side comparison for measuring various parameters between a Windows and a Linux box running NTP. It will require time to set the test but the contribution could be interesting, specially if no work has been done previously. I will use my spare time this weekend to search for information on the subject.
T : 55 55 55202444
M : 04455 20501854
Piensa en Bits SA de CV
CONFIDENCIALIDAD DE INFORMACION
Este mensaje tiene carácter confidencial. Si usted no es el destinarario de este mensaje, le suplicamos se lo notifique al remitente mediante un correo electrónico y que borre el presente mensaje y sus anexos de su computadora sin retener una copia de los mismos. Queda estrictamente prohibido copiar este mensaje o hacer usode el para cualquier propósito o divulgar su en forma parcial o total su contenido. Gracias.
NON-DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION
This email is strictly confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please immediately advise the sender by replying to this e-mail and then deleting the message and its attachments from your computer without keeping a copy. It is strictly forbidden to copy it or use it for any purpose or disclose its contents to any third party. Thank you.
On Oct 27, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Magnus Danielson <magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org> wrote:
> Dear Edgardo,
> On 10/25/2012 02:04 AM, Edgardo Molina wrote:
>> Dear Mangus,
>> I will allow myself to share a comment on your thread.
>> Timing on windows servers is not one of their plausible strengths.
> This comes as no surprise, but I wanted some hard fact to assist in raising the awareness.
> The reason I raised it here is that I didn't have the hard facts at hand when I needed it, and I trust the time-nuts to have a diversity of facts laying around. :)
>> It was clearly pointed out during the SIM conference last week at CENAM.
>> In fact there was an interesting discussion about the drawbacks when
>> using NTP Windows based servers and all kind of NTP appliances compared
>> to full size Linux based NTP servers.
> Is there a presentation or even a paper to illustrate this?
>> The example of what NIST is using nationwide for their servers set an
>> example of good server hardware and linux to provide the nation's NTP pulse.
> Interesting. I have however pointed out that a downside to their strategy is that wide-spread set of servers assist to keep network effects down. In Sweden SP (NMI) and NETNOD operates redundant servers in 4 different locations, at SP and at the three main internet exchange-points.
>> I haven't done any experiments with Windows for NTP services, still it
>> could be interesting as to set a benchmark while comparing it to the
>> Linux boxes.
> My gut feeling says that an undisciplined Windows can be anywhere, configuring a server for the SNTP brings it into decent shape for most workstation usages, shifting over to NTP is needed for many applications but even that won't compete with a Linux or BSD box.
> Being able to show that in a paper is better than arm-waving, even if most people here most probably would believe me without much fact.
>> I am currently trying out the Domain Time II NTP client from
>> Symmetricom for the thesis. I have to come back to Symmetricom's
>> Miguel García to decide on purchasing a Domain Time II NTP client kit.
>> How is the Mainberg NTP client different from the Symmetricom version?
>> Have you tried both?
> I haven't tried either, as I rarely operate a Windows box.
>> If not I will be more than glad to help comparing both if you can help
>> me pointing out the source for a demo version of Mainberg's software.
> Meinberg's NTP is available in fullblown version from their website:
> (the link to that page is available on their front page under the dubious and hard to grasp title "NTP Software Sownload")
> What they have done is essentially port the ntp.org NTP to Windows and gift-wrapped it a little in terms of installation.
>> Maybe then an objective review of both clients will be in order,
>> I will be more than glad to do it or to test them against Windows
>> NTP services, appliances and/or Linux NTP boxes. I have at least an
>> example of those at the office.
> Actually, doing this kind of measurement could be illustrative that your time may be quite dispersed. It helps to raise the question of what time is it really, how could I improve it and can there be an approval mark on the time I have.
>> Just my 2x10 cents.
> That's a large frequency deviation among time-nuts. :)
>> Regards to you and the group,
> Many thanks!
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts