[time-nuts] 60 Hz line quirks, anybody recognize this stuff?

[Hal Murray]

jfor at quikus.com said:
> At a quick look, those look plausible line transients. However, the actual
> plots look badly undersampled during the transients. The plotted results in
> the transient areas are pretty meaningless, IMO. 

I agree.

I'm sampling at 16 bits, 8K samples per second, mono.

I tried 8 bits.  It wasn't enough.

I picked 8K out of the air.  It's a compromise between getting enough data 
and chewing up disk space.  It's good enough for 60 Hz and would probably be 
good enough to show me the next layer of glitches.

2*8K*86400 is 1.38 gigabytes per day.  I've got enough disk space so I can 
run that for a week or two without having to do serious housecleaning.





-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.