[time-nuts] GPSDO Component Selection

Bob Camp lists at rtty.us
Sun Sep 9 21:53:14 UTC 2012


Hi

Position accuracy and timing accuracy are two very different things. Firmware is optimized to improve either one. "Position" firmware is often pretty poor for timing. 

Bob

On Sep 9, 2012, at 5:05 PM, Chris Albertson <albertson.chris at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 1:14 PM,  <bg at lysator.liu.se> wrote:
> 
>> True for a cheap oem navigation receiver. Not true for a geodetic quality
>> receiver, who usually have some options (external frequency input, PPS_in)
>> to make them the best timing receivers available. However they are much
>> more expensive than the typical single frequency timing reciver.
> 
> I looked at every link and can't see where they give a timing accuracy
> spec on the PPS with respect to UTC.   Possition accurracy is very
> good and we might assume the timing is as good.  But they don't say it
> is.  What's interesting is these GPSes will accept an accurate clock
> input in order to give better location data.   That is the opposite of
> a timing GPS where you tell it accurate location data so that it can
> get better timing.   Cutting down the unknown in one lets you do
> better in the other.   I assume these all cost well over $50.  You can
> get a pretty good timing GPS for $30 and it WILL have the PPS error
> specified.
> 
> To the OP.  None of this matters a lot because PPS is a standard input
> signal.  It is easy to swap out a GPS receiver later.  Same with the
> OCXO.  From a control point of view they are all pretty much the same.
> You can swap them out later
> 
> 
> Chris Albertson
> Redondo Beach, California
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.





More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com mailing list