[time-nuts] SDR Radio Opinion- Next Question... (Burt I. Weiner)

[Tammy A Wisdom]

Hey didn't you all see the list owner say this topic isn't for the time nuts list?


Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 7, 2013, at 10:35, Dan Kemppainen <dan at irtelemetrics.com> wrote:

> I don't think the state of the art is exceeding the need. Because by
> nature that is part of what ham radio is. Experimentation is part of the
> game.
> 
> Nothing wrong with appliance operators, if one chooses to be that. There
> are plenty of appliance radios out there. SDR just may not be there yet.
> Of course, lots of the 'modern' radios include technology that was once
> state of the art, and had problems at.
> 
> As for time-nuts and radio, I think SDR is a great place to tie them
> together.
> 
> Dan
> N8XJK
> 
> On 8/7/2013 12:00 PM, time-nuts-request at febo.com wrote:
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 08:25:13 -0700
>> From: "Burt I. Weiner" <biwa at att.net>
>> To: time-nuts at febo.com
>> Subject: [time-nuts] SDR Radio Opinion- Next Question...
>> Message-ID: <590479.76849.bm at smtp119.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>> 
>> Chris and all,
>> 
>> It seems to me that a lot of the new software is being developed by 
>> people who don't live in the real world or don't use the end product 
>> in the real world - or maybe not at all.  Maybe I'm just old and 
>> senile, but a lot of the stuff I'm seeing is not intuitive, stable or 
>> even consistent.
>> 
>> Is the State of The Art exceeding the state of the need?
>> 
>> Burt, K6OQK
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.