[time-nuts] Advantages of differential oscillator structures?

Azelio Boriani azelio.boriani at screen.it
Sat Aug 10 15:13:21 UTC 2013


Build it from discrete parts, of course, what frequency do you suggest
to try? 32768Hz, 1MHz? I have nothing in-between...

On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Magnus Danielson
<magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org> wrote:
> On 08/10/2013 12:10 PM, Attila Kinali wrote:
>> On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 02:39:35 -0700
>> wb6bnq <wb6bnq at cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>> I gather you did not fully read the paper ?
>> I did, but...
>>
>>> This paper presents a circuit topography that allows the low current
>>> operation at a high frequency (12.8 MHz) thus reducing complexity.  This
>>> in turn allows the design and manufacture of a radio system using one
>>> crystal oscillator at a frequency of 12.8 MHz (example in the paper)
>>> with the low power advantage that previously required two oscillators.
>> That's one advantage, and not a small one, but differential oscillators
>> have been in use earlier and even in places where power consumption did
>> not matter much. It pops up in crystal oscillator designs now and then
>> but without any mention why this architecture was choosen. So i started
>> to wonder whether there was any additional advantage than just lower
>> power consumption and being able to work with less headroom, like better
>> phase noise or better long term stability or less harmonics.
> Well, at least from this paper they have not analyzed that. Here they
> only use it for it's benefits in power, which is obvious from the Abstract.
>
> If you wish to know other benefits, they need to be analyzed separately,
> which by itself might prove an interesting paper. Reducing current drawn
> should be interesting, as this should reduce 1/f noise in the feedback
> amp, which should make the 1/f^3 noise lower significantly, which should
> be beneficial for the stability of the oscillator in noise terms,
> however it might not be beneficial for the oscillator in systematic
> frequency drift terms. As always, it's a balance thing.
>
> It should not be too hard to build it, try it, measure it and learn from
> it. Sounds like fun!
>
> Cheers,
> Magnus
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.



More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com mailing list