[time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 102, Issue 59

Me w8cv at comcast.net
Mon Feb 25 20:45:42 UTC 2013



Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID

time-nuts-request at febo.com wrote:

>Send time-nuts mailing list submissions to
>	time-nuts at febo.com
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>	https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>	time-nuts-request at febo.com
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
>	time-nuts-owner at febo.com
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of time-nuts digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
>   1. OCXO DIP (Joseph Gray)
>   2. Re: Thermal noise contribution to phase noise (Bruce Griffiths)
>   3. Re: OCXO DIP (David)
>   4. Re: OCXO DIP (J. L. Trantham)
>   5. Re: Thermal noise contribution to phase noise (Joe Leikhim)
>   6. Re: OT - USB to LPT Adapter - Does it exist? (J. L. Trantham)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:10:03 -0700
>From: Joseph Gray <jgray at zianet.com>
>To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>	<time-nuts at febo.com>
>Subject: [time-nuts] OCXO DIP
>Message-ID:
>	<CAF7oPz1C+7fTJtzZoxVtk+3c+idPWawdQ+rdfxsYhj9sH-u_0w at mail.gmail.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
>I just ordered a few of these. They looked like a potential substitute
>for a larger OXCO in some applications. Does anyone have any
>experience with them?
>
>http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEW-10MHz-OCXO-DIP-Micro-Crystal-x1pc-5x10E-11-Oven-Oscillator-OCVCXO-GPSDO-/310380778466
>
>Joe Gray
>W5JG
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:41:28 +1300
>From: Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffiths at xtra.co.nz>
>To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>	<time-nuts at febo.com>
>Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thermal noise contribution to phase noise
>Message-ID: <50F62F78.7050904 at xtra.co.nz>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>Bob Camp wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> The noise spectrum is composed equally of AM and PM noise. Together they add
>> to -174.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
>> Behalf Of Graham / KE9H
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:46 PM
>> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thermal noise contribution to phase noise
>>
>> Bruce:
>>
>> The last time I looked, the thermal noise floor was still -174 dBm/Hz
>> (at 300 Kelvin).
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_noise
>>
>> Are you saying Boltzmann's constant is off by 3 dB, or are we mixing
>> apples and oranges here?
>>
>> Is there a 3 dB adjustment between noise floor (at room temperature) and
>> the "single side band" phase noise measurement, which only looks at half
>> the noise, since it only looks on one side of the reference signal?
>>
>>    
>The upper and lower sidebansd are coherent so their combined power level 
>is 6dB higher when translated to baseband as is done in a traditional 
>analog diode mixer based phase noise measurement system.
>
>Bruce
>> --- Graham / KE9H
>>
>> ==
>>
>> On 1/15/2013 1:38 PM, Bruce Griffiths wrote:
>>    
>>> I've noticed a disturbing tendency to quote the thermal noise
>>> contribution to phase noise as -174dBm/Hz instead of the corrent value
>>> of -177dBm/Hz as verified by measurement by NIST:
>>> http://tf.nist.gov/phase/noisemeas.html
>>>
>>> This error occurs in papers from Spectrum Microwave, Wenzel Associates
>>> and others.
>>> Blindly propagating the results quoted in the early literature isnt
>>> particularly helpful given that the definition of SSB phase noise has
>>> changed in the intervening decades.
>>>
>>> Bruce
>>>
>>>      
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to
>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>>    
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 3
>Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 22:41:49 -0600
>From: David <davidwhess at gmail.com>
>To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>	<time-nuts at febo.com>
>Subject: Re: [time-nuts] OCXO DIP
>Message-ID: <dlbcf8dke1o651hhgejo8jsll8ee1v5kre at 4ax.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>I know they were discussed here in the past but I do not remember any
>performance reports.  I may buy a couple myself but I do not have the
>equipment yet to evaluate one.
>
>On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:10:03 -0700, Joseph Gray <jgray at zianet.com>
>wrote:
>
>>I just ordered a few of these. They looked like a potential substitute
>>for a larger OXCO in some applications. Does anyone have any
>>experience with them?
>>
>>http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEW-10MHz-OCXO-DIP-Micro-Crystal-x1pc-5x10E-11-Oven-Oscillator-OCVCXO-GPSDO-/310380778466
>>
>>Joe Gray
>>W5JG
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>>To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>and follow the instructions there.
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 4
>Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 22:52:08 -0600
>From: "J. L. Trantham" <jltran at att.net>
>To: "'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'"
>	<time-nuts at febo.com>
>Subject: Re: [time-nuts] OCXO DIP
>Message-ID: <ABCD76CB33014FD395101E2AEA22CD8C at cardiac5f772ce>
>Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"
>
>I bought a couple to put on the shelf for 'future projects'.  IIRC, they are
>square wave, very stable and quite accurate when I tested them. 
>
>However, I did no 'formal' measurement of their performance.
>
>My thought was an OCXO reference that I wanted to build for the HP 5315 and
>5316 A and B series 100 MHz counters.  5 VDC was my main concern.
>
>I think they will do fine and I can likely put it together without having to
>come up with a 'custom' PCB.  Just a 'bread board' approach.
>
>One of these days I need to learn how to 'construct' and order custom PCB's
>online as I have been reading about on the list.
>
>Joe
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
>Behalf Of David
>Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 10:42 PM
>To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>Subject: Re: [time-nuts] OCXO DIP
>
>I know they were discussed here in the past but I do not remember any
>performance reports.  I may buy a couple myself but I do not have the
>equipment yet to evaluate one.
>
>On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:10:03 -0700, Joseph Gray <jgray at zianet.com>
>wrote:
>
>>I just ordered a few of these. They looked like a potential substitute
>>for a larger OXCO in some applications. Does anyone have any
>>experience with them?
>>
>>http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEW-10MHz-OCXO-DIP-Micro-Crystal-x1pc-5x10E-11-Oven
>-Oscillator-OCVCXO-GPSDO-/310380778466
>>
>>Joe Gray
>>W5JG
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>>To unsubscribe, go to
>https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>and follow the instructions there.
>
>_______________________________________________
>time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>To unsubscribe, go to
>https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>and follow the instructions there.
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 5
>Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:36:19 -0500
>From: Joe Leikhim <jleikhim at leikhim.com>
>To: time-nuts at febo.com
>Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thermal noise contribution to phase noise
>Message-ID: <50F63C53.9090501 at leikhim.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> From a practical standpoint, which is it -177 or -174 dBm?
>This is confusing topic.
>
>If for example an FM receiver, does the AM component become irrelevant?
>
>
>_(snip)__
>
>As Bob stated thermal noise is equally divided between AM and PM
>components when a carrier is present.
>
>Both  the AM and PM noise components are -177dBm/Hz their sum is
>-174dBm/Hz.
>
>Bruce_
>
>-- 
>Joe Leikhim
>
>
>Leikhim and Associates
>
>Communications Consultants
>
>Oviedo, Florida
>
>JLeikhim at Leikhim.com
>
>407-982-0446
>
>WWW.LEIKHIM.COM
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 6
>Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:08:03 -0600
>From: "J. L. Trantham" <jltran at att.net>
>To: "'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'"
>	<time-nuts at febo.com>
>Subject: Re: [time-nuts] OT - USB to LPT Adapter - Does it exist?
>Message-ID: <FC46E52FA9D144108A1C35A974AB6B3E at S0028384766>
>Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"
>
>Work has allowed another brief entry to this project.
>
>I opened the SS3 and removed the small PCB that appears to be a USB to
>Parallel Port adapter.
>
>It's part number is WWAVUSBEPP, an interesting choice.  I took some pictures
>of the unit and I can send them to anyone that is interested.  I do not have
>a means of 'posting' the pictures.
>
>It has 4 IC's, U1 through U4.  U1 is a CY7C68013-56LFC which appears to be a
>Cypress EZ-USB FX2 USB Microcontroller High-speed USB Peripheral Controller.
>The data sheet is here:
>
>http://mdfly.com/newmdfly/products/FX56/cy7c68013a.pdf
>
>An evaluation board is available.
>
>http://www.mdfly.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=4_56&products_id
>=107&zenid=at30m3698fqnnoq42ffmgnmrv1
>
>It uses a 24 MHz crystal on the board to drive a 480 MHz oscillator to run
>the microcontroller and there is a part on the WWAVUSBEPP labeled '24.000
>DALE 6K'. 
>
>U2 appears to be an LT 176333 500 mA Low Noise, LDO Micropower Regulator for
>converting the 5 VDC power supply, coming from the main board of the SS3, to
>3.3 VDC.  It's data sheet is here:
>
>http://cds.linear.com/docs/Datasheet/1763fg.pdf
>
>U3 is a mystery.  It appears to be an SOT device with 5 pins with 'SATRIP'
>labeled on the top.  I can not find any information about this chip.
>
>U4 appears to be an ST 24C64WP SOIC 8 pin EEPROM.  It's data sheet is here:
>
>http://www.st.com/internet/com/TECHNICAL_RESOURCES/TECHNICAL_LITERATURE/DATA
>SHEET/CD00259166.pdf
>
>I called BP Micro today and the WWAVUSBEPP is available, in stock, for
>$101.92.  I don't recognize any markings on the unit that might identify who
>made it for BP Micro.  Someone else might be able to from the picture.
>
>So, what further advice and/or recommendations are there?
>
>Thanks again for all the help.
>
>Joe
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
>Behalf Of gary
>Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 12:52 PM
>To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>Subject: Re: [time-nuts] OT - USB to LPT Adapter - Does it exist?
>
>
>I stayed out as well. I didn't want to get into this, but I suspect if 
>you are using the parallel port, bit banging is how they did it. That 
>hasn't worked well since win98. Every newer version of Windows made the 
>ports harder to "own", mostly because once there was multitasking, it 
>became necessary for something to arbitrate what process owned what 
>piece of hardware.
>
>Peek and Poke goes way back. You used to be able to read and write to 
>the ports directly using those functions.
>
>I hate to be negative, but you wouldn't be the first person to get 
>screwed by interface standards changing. Think of those klunker PCs that 
>were kept alive just not to buy another National GPIB board.
>
>Bit banging worked really well under DOS. Many hacks were done using the 
>interrupt lines on the serial ports.
>
>
>
>On 1/14/2013 10:31 AM, J. L. Trantham wrote:
>> Nate,
>>
>> I, too, am hesitant to post an OT issue, and that is the reason I 
>> tried to ask just the bare essentials without clogging up the list 
>> with too much stuff.  However, when I want to know something, I like 
>> to ask the smartest people I know, and this has certainly proven that 
>> point.
>>
>> I think you are giving me way too much credit for my abilities to 
>> 'dissect', 'peek', 'bitbang', and 'VID/PID'.  However, if I am able to 
>> accomplish this, it will be a PhD in 'computer', at least from my 
>> perspective.
>>
>> You have given me a lot of places to start and I am sure I will have a 
>> lot more questions that I can take off list if someone is willing to 
>> lend a hand.  I'll start with removing and inspecting the USB to 
>> Parallel adapter in the SS3 to see if I can get an idea about the 
>> chipset used.  The BP Micro software is easily downloadable from 
>> www.bpmicro.com.  You have to register but it is free.  I will explore 
>> that as well but there is where I will very likely need help.  I know 
>> the software works with WinXP and later (at least Win7, I don't know 
>> about Win8).  Perhaps earlier versions as well.
>>
>> Thanks again to all who have responded and apologies for the OT posts.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] 
>> On Behalf Of Nathaniel Bezanson
>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 9:55 AM
>> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] OT - USB to LPT Adapter - Does it exist?
>>
>> I always feel guilty replying to off-topic threads, but this one just 
>> got interesting! At least most mailers make it easy to mute threads, 
>> so...
>>
>> J. L. Trantham  wrote:
>>> My goal is to connect a BP Micro BP-1600, parallel port connected 
>>> Universal Programmer, to a computer using USB.  BP Micro makes the 
>>> BP-1610 which does just this.  It appears to be the same programmer, 
>>> uses the same software, but connects via a USB port instead of a 
>>> parallel
>> port.
>>
>> Ahh, well there's the part you didn't tell us previously! Mainly, that 
>> the PC-side software already knows how to abstract those calls and 
>> send them over USB -- it's not hard-coded to bitbang the physical 
>> parallel port. That was the major stumbling block, and it's not a 
>> block at all.
>>
>> Odds are that BP Micro wanted to do as little work as possible to 
>> update their design, so they probably used standard silicon in front 
>> of the old parallel-based programmer circuit, with OEM drivers and 
>> just a custom USB VID/PID to make it enumerate properly. If we work on 
>> this assumption, the hack might be trivial indeed.
>>
>> Dissect the USB drivers that come with the software -- there should be 
>> hints in there about the chipset which it expects to see inside the 
>> 1610. Simply right-clicking all the DLLs and stuff should reveal a few 
>> signed by a silicon company, likely Cypress or FTDI. There may be 
>> hints as to the part number. Get your hands on that chip, preferably 
>> by finding a premade USB-to-parallel cable based on it. (These are 
>> usually just the datasheet example circuit.)
>>
>> You can find the expected VID/PID by peeking into the INF included 
>> with the 1610 software.  Use the chipmaker's dev tools to reflash the 
>> USB chip with the appropriate VID/PID, and see if BPWin will talk to 
>> it. (Alternately, edit the INF with the existing VID/PID of the 
>> adapter you're using. This will make every similar USB-to-parallel 
>> cable enumerate as a BP1610, which is obviously the dirtiest hack 
>> ever, but may work just fine.)
>>
>> If the drivers load but the programmer won't initialize, then the ID 
>> parts are right but the connections are wrong. Likely the data lines 
>> are connected straight, and it's just the handshaking lines that might 
>> do things differently than the datasheet example. Working from the 
>> chip datasheet will be your guide as to the possibilities.
>>
>> Rots of ruck!
>> -Nate-
>>
>>    I have not had a
>>> chance to see the inside of the BP-1610 and would really appreciate 
>>> some pictures if anyone has one, particularly the corner of the PCB 
>>> that connects to the USB connection.
>>>
>>> All I have is an Actel Silicon Sculptor 3, also made by BP Micro, 
>>> that looks like the BP-1710 (with the 'START' button) but connects 
>>> via a USB port.  On the main PCB of the BP-1600 and the SS3 are two, 
>>> 2 row, 26 pin, connectors, one toward the back edge of the PCB toward 
>>> the back panel and the other just inside the first connector.  The 
>>> inside connector directly connects to the parallel port on the back 
>>> of the BP-1600.  On the SS3, there is a small PCB that plugs into the 
>>> same connector, takes a power input, and also has 6 pin connections 
>>> to the other 26 pin connector.  This small PCB has a USB connector 
>>> that is
>> connected to the back of the SS3 as the USB connection.
>>>
>>> These observations lead me to believe that it is possible to do a 
>>> 'USB to parallel' adapter to make the connection.  Of course, I don't 
>>> have a clue about the onboard firmware that might be different to 
>>> allow the unit to be recognized as a USB instead of a parallel port 
>>> connected
>> device.
>>>
>>> So, some 'experimenting' seems in order, after first trying to 
>>> closely inspect the small PCB and try to reverse engineer it a bit.
>>>
>>> In the mean time, I have a collection of laptop's and desktop's with 
>>> parallel port connectors so keeping the programmers humming is not a 
>>> problem.  Just would like to make the 'jump' to the 'modern era'.  A 
>>> project that has been in the back of my mind.  I will probably try 
>>> one of the adapters referred to.
>>>
>>> Thanks again for all the info.
>>>
>>> Joe
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On 
>>> Behalf Of GandalfG8 at aol.com
>>> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 5:38 PM
>>> To: time-nuts at febo.com
>>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] OT - USB to LPT Adapter - Does it exist?
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Luis
>>>
>>> No problem, and it's much better anyway to hear from someone  who's 
>>> used
>>> it:-)
>>>
>>> I only took a quick look at the web site before and didn't see the 
>>> self build instructions at that time, but having seen the SMD chip 
>>> he's using I think asking for a price might be safer:-)
>>>
>>> I see from your earlier comments that you've used it ok with old 
>>> programmers but on the page you've linked do he doesn't recommend 
>>> that, have you come across any problems with this?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Nigel
>>> GM8PZR
>>>
>>>
>>> In a message dated 11/01/2013 20:15:15 GMT Standard Time, 
>>> ct1dmk at gmail.com
>>> writes:
>>>
>>> Hi  Nigel,
>>>
>>> I missed your post before my reply to Joe, so I made no mention  to 
>>> your suggestion. I have those and they are not a printer thing, they  
>>> really work low
>> level.
>>> The list of programmers and bit oriented  stuff that was reported to 
>>> work well is big and surely there are  more stuff that works that is 
>>> not in the list...
>>>
>>> Joe,  take a  look a check if you app is reported  good:
>>>
>>> http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~heha/bastelecke/Rund%20um%20den%20PC/
>>> U
>>> SB2LPT
>>> /liste.en.htm
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers.
>>>
>>> Luis  Cupido
>>> ct1dmk.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/11/2013 5:03 PM, GandalfG8 at aol.com  wrote:
>>>> Hi Joe
>>>>
>>>> As per other replies I was going to  suggest this won't work because 
>>>> USB adapters are for printing  only and my solution would be to buy 
>>>> an old
>>> 486 or
>>>> early pentium  laptop and use that, I've bought several over the 
>>>> past
>> few
>>>> years   for really silly money on Ebay for this very reason, but I have
>>> come
>>>>   across what  might be a possible solution....
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~heha/bastelecke/Rund%20um%20den%20PC
>>> /
>>> USB2LP
>>>>   T/index.html.en_
>>>>
>>> (http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~heha/bastelecke/Rund%20um%20den%20PC
>>> /
>>> USB2LP
>>> T/index.html.en)
>>>>
>>>>   I can't vouch for this, just found it via Google, and although the
>>> drivers
>>>> are downloadable you need to buy the adapter and have to email  for
>>> prices,
>>>> but it might be worth a try.
>>>>
>>>> My  preferrred solution would still be the old laptop:-)
>>>>
>>>>   Regards
>>>>
>>>> Nigel
>>>> GM8PZR
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In a  message dated 11/01/2013 13:09:45 GMT Standard Time, 
>>>> jltran at att.net
>>>>   writes:
>>>>
>>>> Not sure  where to ask this question but thought  I would start 
>>>> here.
>>>>
>>>> Is  there a way to connect a parallel  port to a computer via USB? 
>>>> Not  a device that shows up as  'USB Print Support' but, instead, 
>>>> shows up in Device Manager  as an LPT port?  I have been able to do 
>>>> it via PCMCIA  to
>>> Parallel
>>>> Port adapters but I have never found a USB device that would  do 
>>>> this.
>>>>
>>>> My goal is to connect a parallel port chip  programmer via USB but 
>>>> the software only looks for LPT  ports.  It works with PCMCIA to 
>>>> parallel
>>> port
>>>> adapters but  I haven't solved the puzzle yet with a USB  connected
>>> device.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>> Joe
>>>>
>>>>   _______________________________________________
>>>> time-nuts   mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>>>> To unsubscribe, go to
>>>>   https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>> and follow  the  instructions there.
>>>>   _______________________________________________
>>>> time-nuts mailing list  -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>> and follow the  instructions  there.
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the  instructions there.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to 
>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>To unsubscribe, go to
>https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>and follow the instructions there.
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>time-nuts mailing list
>time-nuts at febo.com
>https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>
>End of time-nuts Digest, Vol 102, Issue 59
>******************************************


More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com mailing list