[time-nuts] Traceability after loss of LORAN and WWVB
Jim Lux
jimlux at earthlink.net
Sat Jun 1 23:54:32 UTC 2013
On 6/1/13 4:46 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
>> That is, NIST certifies publicly that WWV is "on frequency" and "on time" with a certain precision. Do I need to go to NIST and pay them to give ma piece of paper that says this, or can I use their published data?
>
> Remember - the original post (and thus the context) is "legally traceable". That's (as mentioned in the original post) the land of lawyers rather than the land of engineers.
>
precisely that (e.g. my procedures in doing this are appropriately
documented, third party reviewed, various artifacts of the process are
maintained, etc.etc.etc.)
The engineering part is straightforward: one might even say "easy",
depending on the level of accuracy needed.
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list