[time-nuts] tube GPS receivers

Bob Camp lists at rtty.us
Sun Jun 23 22:35:25 UTC 2013


Hi

That's a bit past the register sized range, but still a bit small by today's standards. 

Bob

On Jun 23, 2013, at 5:50 PM, Paul Berger <phb.hfx at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi:
> 
> The SAGE computers, which I had the pleasure of seeing the last two operating, had an all vacuum tube array of core that consisted of 33 planes of 64 x64 cores for about 16K worth of memory.  These where all vacuum tube computers.  IBM offered a 4K all vacuum tube core storage unit for the 701 and 702, the same unit was built into the 704 and the 705 had a larger core storage with 35 planes of 50 x 80 cores.  The Remington Rand Corp. and the RAND Corp. also shipped computers that used core for main storage in the mid 50s which likely used vacuum tube drivers.  At that time there where apparently no transistors available that could supply the drive current required for core memory.
> 
> On 6/23/13 5:29 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
>> Hi
>> 
>> I've both used and worked on core memory machines. They ones I have seen all used solid state devices in the core memory sections of the machine. I've never heard of a pure tube machine with more than "register sized" core.
>> 
>> Bob
>> 
>> On Jun 23, 2013, at 1:47 PM, Chris Albertson <albertson.chris at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Magnetic cores were not invented until the 1950's and realy cam into use as
>>> tubes were beibg replaced by SS.  But there isnot reason yu can't build a
>>> tube computer with core memory.   I have actually seen and used a computer
>>> that had one megabyte of core memory.  The stuff was still in use in the
>>> late 1970s   1MB was a lot of RAM in 1975.
>>> 
>>> You can have very good reliability with tube circuits.  It was just that
>>> few people wanted to pay for it.  Down time was cheaper.  It is not hard to
>>> add redundancy to a circuit but it does have a huge cost multiplier effect.
>>> 4x or 5x the price.   One simple way is to use 3 or 4 tubes with their
>>> output tied to a resistive adder.  If one tube fails the result (because it
>>> is binary) is still the same.   With computers no one would pay for fault
>>> tolerant design until it was reasonably affordable.   Even today we mainly
>>> just put up with failure except for airplane controllers, huge web sites
>>> like Amazon and the like.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Brian Alsop <alsopb at nc.rr.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 6/23/2013 14:40, Bob Camp wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi
>>>>> 
>>>>> AC137 doesn't ring any bells. True tube core (no solid state at all)
>>>>> isn't something that was dimensioned in K words. A couple hundred words was
>>>>> pretty big stuff. "Quite a bit" of core done that way is a lot of tubes. As
>>>>> the number of tubes goes up, the time to failure comes down….. hours …
>>>>> minutes … who knows.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Bob
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> Yeah, it gets to be like the cross country aircraft races in the 20's. The
>>>> mechanic had to fly with the pilot. (The MTBF of many of the engines used
>>>> was measured in hours.) If necessary he had to climb out on the cowling
>>>> while in flight to change plugs and fix whatever possible without landing.
>>>> What would OSHA say about that?
>>>> 
>>>> Needless to say future generations will probably find lots of aircraft
>>>> spark plug artifacts in their digs.
>>>> 
>>>> Brian/K3KO
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -----
>>>> No virus found in this message.
>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>>> Version: 2012.0.2242 / Virus Database: 3199/5932 - Release Date: 06/22/13
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
>>>> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts<https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts>
>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> 
>>> Chris Albertson
>>> Redondo Beach, California
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.




More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com mailing list