[time-nuts] hp5065b !!!

[Paul Davis]

Keeping these discussions on list would be quite helpful for us lurkers that try to glean as much information as possible from the posts. While I may not have the expertise to contribute often, I value the insight provided by others. In addition, discussing on list has the benefit of having the messages archived and searchable. I've learned alot (but not nearly enough) by searching the archives for various topics. Please consider keeping such discussions on list.

Paul

On May 1, 2013, at 11:13, Magnus Danielson <magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org> wrote:

> On 05/01/2013 03:26 PM, EWKehren at aol.com wrote:
>> The multiplier and output has been changed significantly. We can not put a
>> finger on one part but if you reed the paper  .
>> http://tf.boulder.nist.gov/general/pdf/1219.pdf     that Bruce posted it does explain the RF
>> significance.I ignored the laser part  since I will not be able to duplicate, but the
>> microwave part clearly outlines  its contribution to performance. Right now
>> we are doing it off list since there  seems not to be much interest in
>> having H Maser like performance at  home.
> 
> There is at least from me, and I know others reads with interest. Remember that many remains silent on the list even if they read it with interest, so number of replies does not reflect interest.
> 
> Cheers,
> Magnus
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.