[time-nuts] powering Trimble Thunderbolt with -5V rather than -12V
Mark C. Stephens
marks at non-stop.com.au
Thu Oct 31 20:57:49 UTC 2013
A popular solution down under is to use a 555 timer driving a charge pump to generate negative rails from a single positive supply.
Example here: http://www.vk2hmc.net/blog/?p=970
Hi all - I'm back :)
--marki
-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On Behalf Of Stewart Cobb
Sent: Thursday, 31 October 2013 5:12 PM
To: time-nuts at febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] powering Trimble Thunderbolt with -5V rather than -12V
Executive summary: you can power a surplus gold Thunderbolt using a -5V supply in place of a -12V supply, and it will probably work just fine.
Details: The manual for Trimble Thunderbolts specifies power supplies of +5V, +12V, and -12V. It turns out that power supplies that provide
+5V, +12V, and -5V are easier to obtain locally. I began to wonder
what circuitry in the Thunderbolt required -12V, and whether it would run just as well on -5V. So I took one apart and started probing.
As far as I can tell, the -12V supply goes to only two places. One is the negative supply pin for the quad op-amp (LT1014) in the DAC circuit for the OCXO. The other is a strange little circuit involving a 2N3904 (SOT-23 marked 1A) near the "232" driver chip, right next to the serial port. This circuit seems to be comparing the -12V input with one of the charge-pump pins on the 232 chip. Its output (?) connects to a test point labeled "MON". I assumed this was non-critical and decided to ignore it.
The LT1014 op-amp is rated for operation on supply voltage as little as 5V and as much as 30V (+/- 15V). The spec sheet says the output saturates about (1V typical / 3.5V max over temperature) above the negative supply. Presumably, if the op-amp is not asked to generate output voltages lower than -1.5V, it should run fine with a -5V negative supply.
The only negative voltages I could find, probing around the op-amp circuit, were generated by AC-coupling digital square waves. None of the op-amp outputs were negative. (My DAC steady-state value was around +300mV, which appeared many places in the circuit. Presumably a slightly negative DAC value would also appear in many places, but as long as it's greater than -1500mV, it won't matter.)
Armed with theoretical and practical confirmation that this should work, I tried it. And, oddly enough, it appears to be working. Two different Thunderbolts have been powered by +5/+12/-5 supplies, and both have settled down and started tracking exactly as one would expect. For one, the "settled" DAC voltage was within a few millivolts of the value it had on the specified power supplies, shortly before the change. The other had not been powered on for a while and is still settling, but it seems happy.
There is a subtle possibility for concern, in that the sensitive DAC signals near ground are now about 3.5V away from the center of the op-amp supply range. This could theoretically cause increased distortion, offset, or offset drift due to the larger common-mode voltage on the op-amp inputs. In practice, it does not appear to be an issue.
This note applies to the common surplus Thunderbolts in the gold-anodized box, with the Trimble-branded OCXO. All of those I've tried seem to settle with DAC voltages near zero. If you try this with another style of Thunderbolt, you're on your own.
Cheers!
--Stu
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list