[time-nuts] Space mission comes to an end because of a "computer time tagging" problem

Jim Lux jimlux at earthlink.net
Sat Sep 21 13:22:53 UTC 2013


On 9/21/13 5:41 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'd be a bit surprised if they were running anything as power hungry as an Rb all the time when a quartz based device would be smaller / lower power / lower volume. Of course they may have had mission requirements that drive them to a hydrogen maser ...
>
>

Quartz is king..
either a TCXO or maybe an OCXO or USO

But this is why the Deep Space Atomic Clock (a trapped Hg+ ion clock) is 
so interesting. It has the potential of beating the USO in performance, 
size, mass, and delivery lead time.

A USO takes a long time to build. You need to get a bunch of crystals 
and oscillators and run them to see what the aging characteristics are, etc.

An atomic standard doesn't have the "carefully selected crystal" issue.






More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com mailing list