[time-nuts] Looking for GPSDO for home use
Tom Van Baak
tvb at LeapSecond.com
Thu Apr 17 17:14:27 EDT 2014
> Having done extensive testing on the ublox 6M that you can buy with antenna
> for less than $ 23 new from DX.com I can say with certainty that the 1 Hz
> pulse is better than 1 E-9 accurate, closer to E-10. Depending on the
There are lots of cheap GPS/1PPS receivers out there these days. Having tested many GPS receivers myself, let me help you out. I understand the number $23. But the number "1 E-9" by itself means nothing. Like, are you talking time or frequency? There's a big difference.
Tell us if your number is timing accuracy or units of frequency accuracy or stability. Also either way, the measurement interval (or tau) is critical:
a) If it's timing, then the units are usually seconds; e.g., 1 ns, peak-to-peak, or rms or even something like TDEV(tau) -- and tau is important.
b) If it's frequency, then the units of absolute frequency accuracy or relative frequency stability; e.g., 0.01 Hz out of 10 MHz over some tau, or MDEV/ADEV(tau) -- and tau is critical.
I say this because:
a) If the 1e-9 or 1e-10 number you quote is rms time accuracy, then you have a GPS receiver better than what NIST or USNO has!
b) If the 1e-9 or 1e-10 number you quote is frequency stability over a day, then you have the worst GPS receiver we've ever seen!
So please clarify your units, or share raw data, or plots, or something. It's rather important.
More information about the time-nuts