[time-nuts] MC100LVEL34

[John C. Westmoreland, P.E.]

John,

OK - no problem there - in fact - that's kindof good.

Thanks For The Help,
John W.


On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:13 AM, John Miles <john at miles.io> wrote:

> There were quite a few spurs in those tests due to a wide-open layout with
> cables running everywhere.  That bump was just a case where the software
> didn't get rid of them all.
>
> You can assume they'll be reasonably flat past 1 MHz.  That's as far as
> those plots went.
>
> -- john, KE5FX
> Miles Design LLC
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-
> > bounces at febo.com] On Behalf Of John C. Westmoreland, P.E.
> > Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 1:06 AM
> > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] MC100LVEL34
> >
> > Hello John M.,
> >
> > Thanks for the plot.  Did you take that out past 1MHz - I assume it stayS
> > 'flat' - maybe not.
> >
> > What explains that little spike at 10kHz for the AD9511?  Interesting
> > artifact.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > John W.
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>