[time-nuts] NIST isolation amplifiers
Bob Camp
kb8tq at n1k.org
Thu Nov 27 02:37:42 UTC 2014
Hi
Run in common base ( with things done properly) you can get well over 60 db isolation on a single stage.
Bob
> On Nov 26, 2014, at 2:59 AM, Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffiths at xtra.co.nz> wrote:
>
> A single 2N2222 or equivalent transistor in a suitable circuit dissipating about 200mW or so can achieve a reverse isolation of 35dB with distortion of around -40dBc (output +13dBm) with a gain of unity, and an output impedance of 50 ohms with a PN floor of around -180dBc/Hz or so.
> Bruce
>
> On Wednesday, 26 November 2014 9:13 PM, Charles Steinmetz <csteinmetz at yandex.com> wrote:
>
>
> Bruce wrote:
>
>> Another issue is that if even one output needs high reverse isolation and
>> low crosstalk, then even those outputs that arent so critical will also need
>> high reverse isolation and low crosstalk to avoid degrading the crosstalk
>> to the critical output.
>
> This brings up the distinction between *isolation* amplifiers and
> *distribution* amplifiers. Most of us need a dozen or three feeds
> for various test equipment, radios, etc. These feeds should have 50
> ohm output impedance, moderate isolation (35dB or more), and should
> not noticeably degrade the noise, PN, distortion, or xDEV of the
> source. That is the job of a distribution amp.
>
> I would generally not use anything like one of the NIST circuits for
> this, but rather some version of a two- or three-transistor Class A
> buffer amplifier. There are lots of circuits to choose from. Many
> are transformer (or autoformer) coupled, some are not (the JPL
> circuits come to mind) and can also be used to distribute lower
> frequencies. You can get build-out the NIST way (buffer amp input
> impedance high so you parallel a bunch of them at the input
> connector), or by using one stage with low output impedance to drive
> a number of output amplifiers in parallel, or by using an amplifier
> with very low output impedance (perhaps a high-current monolithic
> amplifier) to drive a number of 50 ohm build-out resistors, or by
> fanning out with CMOS logic and following each CMOS final buffer with
> a Tee network to generate sine waves.
>
> Then there are the times when you are making measurements of
> oscillators and must absolutely ensure that there is no interaction
> between them. That is the job of an isolation amp. Rarely will you
> need more than two or three feeds per oscillator, so what you need
> are several, one-to-three iso amps (one for each oscillator). Here,
> something like the NIST amplifiers makes sense.
>
> Note that I'm advocating distributing sine waves exclusively, NOT
> square waves or pulse trains. You will find that it is hard enough
> keeping 1, 5, or 10 MHz from getting into everything in the shop (and
> radio room), without adding the much-increased difficulty of keeping
> all of the harmonics under control. Also, you would like the
> harmonic content to be rather lower than is often thought because (i)
> even harmonics cause asymmetry, which can cause phase modulation when
> the signal is AC coupled or feeds a comparator-type zero-cross
> detector, and (ii) variations in the phase of harmonics in relation
> to the fundamental cause phase modulation (this is "harmonic
> dispersion," which is caused by temperature changes and other circuit
> variations such as modulation of semiconductor capacitances by low
> frequecies). NIST published a paper on this (see Walls and
> Ascarrunz, "The Effect of Harmonic Distortion on Phase Errors in
> Frequency Distribution and Synthesis").
>
> Best regards,
>
> Charles
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list