[time-nuts] LTE-Lite module

[Charles Steinmetz]

Bob wrote:

>We tend to focus on this or that enhanced feature in a piece of 
>code. It's fun to talk about. That's not what keeps most designs 
>from doing what they should. By focusing on this rather than the 
>testing required, we set people up to fail. If you start off the 
>project believing you mostly need fancy code when you mostly need 
>long term testing instead, you hit a wall pretty fast. Setting up 
>for one is not at all the same as setting up for the other.

Not really sure what this has to do with my post to which you 
replied??  I assure you, I do not find code to be a fun, or even very 
interesting, topic of conversation, and I did not mention it at all 
in that post.  Really, the only thing I've said about code is that 
I've found it takes more than 100 lines to do a proper ADPLL.  When I 
have some time, I have to sit down and study Poul-Henning's code to 
see what I can learn from it about parsimony.

Best regards,

Charles