[time-nuts] Correcting jitter on the 1 PPS signal from a GPSreceiver.
Peter Reilley
peter at reilley.com
Sat Sep 13 21:00:12 UTC 2014
Yes, both have completed their surveys. During the survey process
I was getting up to 150 uS of error between the PPS pulses.
Pete.
-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On Behalf Of Bob Camp
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2014 4:33 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Correcting jitter on the 1 PPS signal from a
GPSreceiver.
Hi
Have they both completed a survey and does the survey make sense?
Bob
On Sep 13, 2014, at 10:41 AM, Peter Reilley <peter at reilley.com> wrote:
> I have 2 Trimble Resolution T receivers and I have compared the 1 PPS
signal
> between the 2 units. They are spec'ed at 15 nS accuracy. I am seeing
> about
> 80 nS of jitter between the two. This is with about 6 satellites in
view.
>
> I was thinking about ways to improve this. Since this is a stationary
> installation,
> can you use the jitter in the reported location (latitude and
> longitude) to correct for the 1 PPS jitter?
>
> The location data is derived using the internal GPS disciplined
> oscillator so both
> pieces of information should show the same jitter error. If you compare
> the reported
> location with the known fixed location you should be able to use that
> error to correct for the 1 PPS error.
>
> Does this make sense or am I missing something?
>
> Pete.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list