[time-nuts] RG 6 U couplings

Hal Murray hmurray at megapathdsl.net
Sun Dec 6 19:23:45 EST 2015

cfharris at erols.com said:
> It is important to note that RG58 <> RG6 <> Quad RG6.  They are each
> different in diameter, loss, and shielding capability. 

Is the attenuation of RG6 significantly different from Quad RG6?

I'd expect the loss to be primarily determined by the size of the center 
conductor which would be the same.

These are my opinions.  I hate spam.

More information about the time-nuts mailing list