[time-nuts] Data collection from 5115A phase noise test set?

John Ackermann N8UR jra at febo.com
Thu Dec 10 15:11:28 EST 2015


There is a gotcha in the TSC phase data... the architecture introduces a 
deliberate phase offset to the phase data so you will always gain (or 
lose) phase over time.  Hook both inputs to the same source, and you'll 
still have a slope in the output data (and the slope and intercept will 
be different on each run).

Thus you *cannot* derive the actual frequency or phase offset from the 
phase data -- it is only useful for stability and phase noise analysis. 
  The TSC people told me this was a feature, not a bug. :-)  If you want 
to get the actual frequency of the DUT, you need to use the fcounter 
function.  And I've never been sure about the averaging used to derive 
the 1/10/100/1000 second values from fcounter, and how best to derive a 
longer-term frequency average from that data.

John

On 12/10/2015 1:44 PM, Tom Van Baak wrote:
> Lucky you! The 5115A has a thousand times better resolution than a hp5370 or SR620 counter.
>
> The architecture of the 5110A 5115A and 5120A is described in the manuals. These are frequency stability analyzers so the initial phase and frequency offsets are not important. What you're seeing is phase difference data *after* these initial calibration offsets are removed. This is necessary because the unit allows a wide-range of frequencies on either port.
>
> That method also keeps the floating point output from losing accuracy over long runs. A count of raw cycles would grow unbounded and you would lose resolution as you gained range. So what you're seeing is by design and it doesn't affect the phase noise or ADEV plots at all. I'm not sure why you call it "useless".
>
> Note the 5110A has a single-DDS option. When both inputs are nominally the same frequency the streaming data is closer to raw phase. Not sure if the 5115/5120 does also. But either way, none of this matters to ADEV.
>
> Your ADEV plots from raw data should match the ADEV plots on the screen. Watch out for bandwidth mismatch.
>
> /tvb
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anders Wallin" <anders.e.e.wallin at gmail.com>
> To: "Discussion" <time-nuts at febo.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 7:20 AM
> Subject: [time-nuts] Data collection from 5115A phase noise test set?
>
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> A 5115A phase noise test set landed in our lab and I am wondering about the
>> data collection.
>> It has two telnet ports one for commands and one for phase data.
>> When issuing "start" on the command-port it starts spitting out
>> phase-difference values on the data port.
>>
>> However it seems to me that the phase data alone (REF-DUT phase, in units
>> of the REF period) is almost useless without knowing the internal workings
>> of the device.
>> The phase values are clearly not the true phase difference, which would
>> quickly accumulate to a huge number with e.g. REF=10MHz and DUT=11MHz. My
>> understanding is that digital downconversion (DDC) is performed on both REF
>> and DUT signals, and without knowing the LO frequencies for the DDC the raw
>> phase data alone is almost useless.
>>
>> The command prompt does have commands for displaying the internally
>> calculated ADEV, L(f), frequency-counter readings, etc. and these seem to
>> show correct and OK values, but there seems to be no way to reproduce e.g.
>> the ADEV or frequency-counter values/statistics from the raw phase values
>> on the data port??
>> Is this correct? Any other experiences with the 5115A or higher end 5120A?
>>
>> thanks,
>> Anders
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>



More information about the time-nuts mailing list