[time-nuts] 10544A vs. 10811

[Richard (Rick) Karlquist]

On 2/1/2015 2:31 PM, Magnus Danielson wrote:
> As I recall it, the 10544 is a BT-cut and not AT-cut.
> We discussed this a few years back, and even checked the cold
> temperature before heating up, and it matched BT-cut and not AT-cut.
>
> Anyway, go with the 10811.
>
> Cheers,
> Magnus
>
> On 02/01/2015 07:51 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:
>> The other big difference is that the 10811 uses
>> an SC cut crystal instead of an AT cut crystal.

I stand corrected.

Rick