[time-nuts] wwvb gps d-psk-r details
Bob Camp
kb8tq at n1k.org
Fri Sep 25 19:57:14 UTC 2015
Hi
Once it’s sync’d with GPS, a normal MCU clock should be able to drive it for a
few days if you had some sort of initial calibration process.
Bob
> On Sep 25, 2015, at 9:15 AM, John Ackermann N8UR <jra at febo.com> wrote:
>
> I may be remembering incorrectly, but I thought that you only need the GPS for initial sync; after that shouldn't the processor be able to maintain the sequence without new GPS input, so long as the timer clock doesn't drift too badly? From a known starting point, the modulation pattern should be predictable into the future.
>
> John
> ----
>
> On 9/24/2015 5:11 PM, Charles Steinmetz wrote:
>> Paul wrote:
>>
>>> Here is the detailed document on the wwvb d-psk-r.
>>
>> Interesting solution, and a good study in persistence.
>> Congratulations! But I thought the main point of having a working WWVB
>> receiver was as a backup if GPS fails (or for use in circumstances where
>> WWVB reception is possible but not GPS reception). If GPS is working,
>> and you have a GPS rx/GPSDO, what is the point of having a time and/or
>> frequency source that relies on GPS but only has the precision of WWVB?
>> And what good is the predictive de-psk-r when GPS is not working?
>>
>> [Yes, I get that if one runs a museum it's nice to have working exhibits
>> even if they are simulated, and it's no big deal if the exhibits don't
>> work from time to time. But the curator's solution doesn't seem to
>> solve the time-nuts' real problem.]
>>
>> I hasten to add that I don't really care one way or the other about GPS
>> alternatives, particularly alternatives with the relative imprecision of
>> WWVB over time scales shorter than geological. Personally, I presume
>> that if there is ever a persistent, system-wide GPS failure it will be
>> due to a natural or man-made catastrophe of earthshaking proportions
>> (literally) and there will be many, more urgent concerns than time-nuts'
>> experiments. But others have expressed concern over having just one
>> time and frequency standard available. For them, isn't a fully
>> independent solution that does not rely on GPS required?
>>
>> Again, congratulations on bringing this idea to fruition.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Charles
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to
>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list