[time-nuts] WWVB format change in 2012
Sanjeev Gupta
ghane0 at gmail.com
Sun Feb 28 07:09:32 UTC 2016
Hi,
I am reviewing and expanding and for the NTPSec project <
http://www.ntpsec.org >, a fork of NTP.
Among NTPSec's goals are a smaller, auditable, code-base; hence support for
receivers last available in the early-1990s is being removed.
I have been on this list for some years (thank you), but as I am in
Singapore, I did not pay attention to the WWVB format change. I understand
that as a result of the change, precision equipment may not be able to
recover a usable signal from the new modulation scheme, rendering it
useless for the sub-100 microsec disciplining.
However, I am not clear if WWV and WWVH are still usable by commercially
available equipment, or of such equipment is also obsolete now.
I have read Wikipedia, the NIST pages, etc, and am still confused. Could
someone summarise current state:
1. Are there commercially (or widely-used) receivers for professional
use which listen to the WWVB signal?
2. Are there commercially (or widely-used) receivers for professional
use which listen to the WWV(H) signal?
A supplementary question: If you have your own homebrew for these signals,
do you use them as a refclock for NTP?
Thank you
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list