[time-nuts] Need for a document comparing time interval counters
Richard (Rick) Karlquist
richard at karlquist.com
Mon Nov 21 17:15:56 EST 2016
On 11/21/2016 1:10 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
> With both counters running on the same external standard (and no internal OCXO), the 53230
> beats the 53132 both on frequency and time. It also has slightly better isolation of the 10 MHz
> internals so the “dead zone” at 10 MHz is not quite as bad. I have no idea how either one
> works with the OCXO option … I’ve never seen either one with an OCXO.
I remember when the 10 MHz section of the 53132 was designed.
The designers had little knowledge of how to do that correctly.
It wasn't their fault; it was the fault of the manager who
assigned the task to them.
More information about the time-nuts