[time-nuts] UCCM arrived
Chris Albertson
albertson.chris at gmail.com
Sun Nov 27 06:31:36 UTC 2016
Here is my take on this: Why worry about a few dB of attenuation in the
cable when you have a 100% blockage problem for half the sky?
With GPS receivers, cable attenuation (within reason) is not important.
What matters is if you can see the satellites or not. It is more of a
binary on/off kind of thing. The data is digital, you either get the bits
or not.
So, by my above rule you only need to upgrade the cable if cable
attenuation is such that the signal is close to the receivers sensitivity.
Even then you can usually find a higher gain antenna. At some point
after maybe 50 meters of cable you might need to consider low loss cable
Nothing in the setup is more important that having an unobstructed view of
the sky
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Bob Camp <kb8tq at n1k.org> wrote:
> Hi
>
> For a long term installation, an antenna location that will “see” more
> sat’s is a really good idea.
>
> Bob
>
> > On Nov 26, 2016, at 8:55 PM, Giuseppe Marullo <giuseppe at marullo.it>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello to all,
> >
> > I connected the unit to a 11m of H-155 cable(assumed 4.79dB loss "worst
> case" at 1.5GHz), thrown the GPS antenna on the balcony horizontally and
> this is what I got:
> >
> > UCCM-P >SYSTem:STATus?
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------
> > 57964-80 serial number 87896988 firmware ver 2.0.1.6-01 LINK
> mode
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------
> > Reference Status __________________________ Reference Outputs
> _______________
> > XX Ref 8KHz 0: [Unusable]
> > XX Ref 8KHz 1: [LOS] TFOM 2 FFOM
> 0
> > XX Ref 8KHz 2: [LOS] UCCM A Status[ACTIVE]
> > XX Ref 8KHz 3: [LOS]
> > >> GPS: [phase:-1.2E-08]
> > ACQUISITION ...................................................[GPS
> 1PPS Valid]
> > Tracking: 4 ____ Not Tracking: 6 ________ Time
> ____________________________
> > PRN El Az C/N PRN El Az GPS 23:42:46 26 Nov
> 2016
> > 24 45 139 43 25 57 286
> > 6 24 62 38 19 11 42 ANT DLY -1 ns
> > 2 30 101 46 32 37 279 Position
> ________________________
> > 29 30 206 41 12 70 37 MODE Hold
> > 14 26 309
> > 31 8 309 LAT N 45:40:29.276
> > LON E 9:26:51.177
> > HGT +320.96 m (MSL)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ELEV MASK 5 deg
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------
> >
> > Command complete
> > UCCM-P >
> >
> >
> > Seems to work (? I understand this from GPS phase and FFOM 0, not sure
> about the hold position status) I have somewhat stable 10MHz output,
> tomorrow I will use a mast for the antenna to get it higher slightly above
> the roof, (vertically this time!).
> >
> > - I got the software from the seller but complains about some ancient
> OCX stuff don't want to mess with ActiveX anymore, hopefully Lady Heater
> will support it soon.
> >
> > - Given the attenuation (less than 5 dB) do I really need to change the
> cable for something better?
> >
> > Leds are Yellow Activity solid, red unnamed blinking fast, Red 1PPS
> blinks once a second and DC green is solid.
> >
> > Anything else special to check?
> >
> >
> > Giuseppe Marullo
> >
> > IW2JWW - JN45RQ
> >
> >
> > PS: the other clock (qrp-labs) is way behind schedule, but hopefully
> will arrive soon
> >
> >
> > `
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > and follow the instructions there.
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
--
Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list