[time-nuts] CSAC vs NAC1
paul swed
paulswedb at gmail.com
Fri Apr 7 00:11:29 UTC 2017
Jim am I reading the casc power consumption correctly? .12 and .14 W.
Thats 10X lower.
Any idea on the $$
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 6:11 PM, jimlux <jimlux at earthlink.net> wrote:
> Here's a quick summary of the datasheet performance between the
> Vectron/Accubeat NAC1 and the MicroSemi CSAC. Bear in mind that Microsemi
> now has a wider temp range (i'm using the old rev J datasheet)
>
> CSAC is 1/10th the power
> NAC1 has a better crystal, so the phase noise is better
> the "atomic" part is comparable in performane
>
>
> Parameter NAC1 CSAC
> Aging 3E-10/mo 9E-10
> 1E-9/yr 10E-9
>
> ADEV 2E-11 @ 100sec 2.5E-11
> 8E-11 @ 10 8E-11
> 2E-10 @ 1 sec 2.5E-10
>
> phase noise
> -86 @ 10 -70
> -120 @ 100 -113
> -138 @ 1000 -128
> -143 @ 10k -135
> -148 @ 100k -140
> -150 floor
>
> max chg 1E-9 (-20 to 65) 5E-10 (-10 to 35)
>
> pwr 1.2W op 0.12
> 1.8W warm 0.14
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
> ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list