[time-nuts] A look inside the DS3231
Pete Stephenson
pete at heypete.com
Sun Jul 30 19:21:42 UTC 2017
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017, at 03:37 PM, Mark Sims wrote:
> A friend of mine is an engineer for one of the biggest manufacturers of
> clock chips and has worked quite a bit on their clock chips and is quite
> familiar with the issues of building consistent ultra low power
> oscillators in a production product. Getting nanowatt (and now
> sub-nanowatt) level oscillators to do their thing consistently is not
> easy. Getting them to do it with customer supplied crystals is a big
> thing. Variations by the crystal maker regularly cause previously
> working products to stop working. Also they are notoriously sensitive to
> PCB layout issues. Older, higher power clock chips don't have nearly as
> many problems as the newer ultra low power designs. Competition to see
> who can make the lowest power clock chips seems to be one of the biggest
> drivers for new clock chip designs.
What's the motivation for this, other than "because we can"? Aren't
existing RTC chips capable of running 10+ years from a lithium coin cell
already, to the point where the cell's self-discharge is the limiting
factor?
Is there some application where exceptionally low power use for a clock
chip would be of interest?
I ask as an interested amateur not familiar with the subtleties of such
designs.
Cheers!
-Pete
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com
mailing list