[time-nuts] Cheap jitter measurements

[Hal Murray]

kb8tq at n1k.org said:
> Yes, but looping back to the start of this thread, the intent is to actually
> measure the jitter directly.  That’s where the whole need for a stamped
> pulse comes from. To paraphrase the earlier comments, the intent is to get
> away from a “self reported” result and actually do a direct measurement.  

I think that should be a reasonable project.

1) Write some code to grab the time, send a pulse, grab the time.  Log that.
2) Use a time-stamp counter to log the time of the pulse.
3) Write the software to merge the two log files.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.